176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12920753)
1. Accuracy of a slide profiler for endocervical cell detection in no-further-review conventional Pap smears.
Rowe LR; Marshall CJ; Berry M; Larson MA; Bentz JS
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(4):602-4. PubMed ID: 12920753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A retrospective validation of the FocalPoint GS slide profiler NFR technology by analysis of interval disease outcomes compared with manual cytology.
Nuttall DS; Hillier S; Clayton HR; Savage AJ; Martin CM; O'Leary JJ
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Apr; 127(4):240-246. PubMed ID: 30825407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Health technology assessment report: Computer-assisted Pap test for cervical cancer screening].
Della Palma P; Moresco L; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 3):e1-43. PubMed ID: 23139174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of reporting the presence of transformation zone material in Papanicolaou smears using an automated screening system.
Erbarut Seven I; Mollamemisoglu H; Eren F
Cytopathology; 2017 Aug; 28(4):280-283. PubMed ID: 28008671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women.
Parnpoonsarp W; Ploarsa P; Arpakorn V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 19702064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. BD focalpoint slide profiler performance with atypical glandular cells on SurePath Papanicolaou smears.
Chute DJ; Lim H; Kong CS
Cancer Cytopathol; 2010 Apr; 118(2):68-74. PubMed ID: 20209621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Presence of endocervical cells and number of slides in cervicovaginal smears: differences in performance between gynecologists.
Celasun B
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):730-4. PubMed ID: 11575651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new, liquid-based cytology technique.
Weynand B; Berlière M; Haumont E; Massart F; Pourvoyeur A; Bernard P; Donnez J; Galant C
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 12685180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the AutoPap primary screening system at Jefferson University Hospital.
Bibbo M; Hawthorne C
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 9987446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytomorphologic Features of Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Liquid-Based Preparations.
Schwock J; Starova B; Khan ZF; Mirkovic J; Parra-Herran C; Ko HM; Rouzbahman M; Ghorab Z
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 33152741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The value of the Cytobrush for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix.
Kawaguchi K; Nogi M; Ohya M; Nishikawa Y; Kobayashi TK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1987 Sep; 3(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 3665693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate?
Kivlahan C; Ingram E
Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histologic follow-up of atypical endocervical cells. Liquid-based, thin-layer preparation vs. conventional Pap smear.
Wang N; Emancipator SN; Rose P; Rodriguez M; Abdul-Karim FW
Acta Cytol; 2002; 46(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 12040636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sensitivity and specificity of endocervical curettage and the endocervical brush for the evaluation of the endocervical canal.
Andersen W; Frierson H; Barber S; Tabbarah S; Taylor P; Underwood P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Sep; 159(3):702-7. PubMed ID: 3048105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Modified endocervical vaginal smear for diagnosis of endocervical microinvasive cervix carcinoma].
Melsheimer P; Hahn U; Herberling D; Wallwiener D; Rummel HH; Bastert G
Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(11):608-10. PubMed ID: 8533497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Value of histiocyte detection in Pap smears for predicting endometrial pathology. An institutional experience.
Nassar A; Fleisher SR; Nasuti JF
Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 14526675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated identification of diploid reference cells in cervical smears using image analysis.
van der Laak JA; Siebers AG; Cuijpers VM; Pahlplatz MM; de Wilde PC; Hanselaar AG
Cytometry; 2002 Apr; 47(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 11933016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endocervical cell recovery.
Lee D; Wheelock JB; Patrissi GA
Mil Med; 1992 Jan; 157(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 1603368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
