BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12921398)

  • 1. Optimal and efficient crossover designs under different assumptions about the carryover effects.
    Hedayat AS; Stufken J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2003 Aug; 13(3):519-28. PubMed ID: 12921398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design and analysis issues for crossover designs in phase I clinical studies.
    Boon PC; Roes KC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1999 Mar; 9(1):109-28. PubMed ID: 10091913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CrossOver: an algorithm for the construction of efficient cross-over designs.
    John JA; Russell KG; Whitaker D
    Stat Med; 2004 Sep; 23(17):2645-58. PubMed ID: 15316948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimal and/or Efficient Two treatment Crossover Designs for Five Carryover Models.
    Gondaliya J; Divecha J
    Int J Biostat; 2018 Nov; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 30471221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Crossover versus parallel designs: dose-escalation design comparisons for first-in-human studies.
    Yan Z; Hosmane B; Locke C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(4):804-17. PubMed ID: 23786490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal crossover designs for logistic regression models in pharmacodynamics.
    Waterhouse TH; Eccleston JA; Duffull SB
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(6):881-94. PubMed ID: 17146986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the role of Baseline measurements for crossover designs under the self and mixed carryover effects model.
    Liang Y; Carriere KC
    Biometrics; 2010 Mar; 66(1):140-8. PubMed ID: 19432775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal crossover designs in the presence of carryover effects.
    Laska E; Meisner M; Kushner HB
    Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):1087-91. PubMed ID: 6671121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal and/or efficient three treatment crossover designs for five carryover models.
    Gondaliya J; Divecha J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2020 May; 30(3):445-461. PubMed ID: 31721628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of alternative statistical models for crossover studies to demonstrate caffeine adjuvancy in the treatment of tension headache.
    Koch GG; Amara IA; MacMillan J
    J Biopharm Stat; 1994 Nov; 4(3):347-410. PubMed ID: 7881452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the impact of carryover effects on the variances of estimators of treatment differences in crossover designs.
    Ozan MO; Stufken J
    Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2480-5. PubMed ID: 20683837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Modelling and design of cross-over trials.
    Jones B; Donev AN
    Stat Med; 1996 Jul; 15(13):1435-46. PubMed ID: 8841653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tests for inter-subject and total variabilities under crossover designs.
    Lee Y; Shao J; Chow SC; Wang H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2002 Nov; 12(4):503-34. PubMed ID: 12477072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-period crossover designs for two treatments.
    Ebbutt AF
    Biometrics; 1984 Mar; 40(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 6733230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal designs for estimating the interesting part of a dose-effect curve.
    Miller F; Guilbaud O; Dette H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(6):1097-115. PubMed ID: 18027219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Design and analysis of crossover trials for absorbing binary endpoints.
    Nason M; Follmann D
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):958-65. PubMed ID: 19930189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The place of the crossover design in infertility trials: a maximum likelihood approach.
    McDonnell J; Goverde AJ; Vermeiden JP
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2537-44. PubMed ID: 15459169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On assessment of bioequivalence under a higher-order crossover design.
    Chow SC; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 1992; 2(2):239-56. PubMed ID: 1300216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of baseline covariates on the efficiency of statistical analyses of crossover designs.
    Yan Z
    Stat Med; 2013 Mar; 32(6):956-63. PubMed ID: 22903413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the designs of thorough QT/QTc clinical trials.
    Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):43-56. PubMed ID: 23331220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.