BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12921421)

  • 1. Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model.
    Hanley JR; Bakopoulou E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 12921421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the irrelevance of phonological similarity to the irrelevant speech effect.
    LeCompte DC; Shaibe DM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 Feb; 50(1):100-18. PubMed ID: 9080790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect?
    Hanley JR
    Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Disruption of verbal STM by irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and manual tapping: do they have a common source?
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1249-68. PubMed ID: 14578082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression is a suffix effect even with five-item lists.
    Hanley JR; Shah N
    Memory; 2012 Jul; 20(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 22497740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The phonological loop and the irrelevant speech effect: some comments on Neath (2000).
    Baddeley AD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):544-9. PubMed ID: 11082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The phonological loop model of working memory: an ERP study of irrelevant speech and phonological similarity effects.
    Martín-Loeches M; Schweinberger SR; Sommer W
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Jul; 25(4):471-83. PubMed ID: 9259625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory.
    Neath I
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect.
    Neath I; Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 9584441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Similarities between the irrelevant sound effect and the suffix effect.
    Hanley JR; Bourgaize J
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Aug; 46(6):841-848. PubMed ID: 29600481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The irrelevant sound effect under articulatory suppression: is it a suffix effect?
    Hanley JR; Hayes A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):482-7. PubMed ID: 21928934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression.
    Neath I; Farley LA; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2003 Nov; 56(8):1269-78; discussion 1301-6. PubMed ID: 14578083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The phonological store of working memory: is it phonological and is it a store?
    Jones DM; Macken WJ; Nicholls AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):656-74. PubMed ID: 15099134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].
    Saito S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Oct; 64(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8301894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habituation to irrelevant speech: effects on a visual short-term memory task.
    Morris N; Jones DM
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 2326151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory.
    Mueller ST; Seymour TL; Kieras DE; Meyer DE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1353-80. PubMed ID: 14622066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant speech effects and statistical learning.
    Neath I; Guérard K; Jalbert A; Bireta TJ; Surprenant AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1551-9. PubMed ID: 19370483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: implications for models of short-term verbal memory.
    Larsen JD; Baddeley A; Andrade J
    Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 10889899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of irrelevant speech and articulatory suppression on the serial recall of silently presented lipread digits.
    Divin W; Coyle K; James DT
    Br J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 92(Pt 4):593-616. PubMed ID: 11762863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.