These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12921421)
41. Phonological similarity and the irrelevant speech effect: implications for models of short-term verbal memory. Larsen JD; Baddeley A; Andrade J Memory; 2000 May; 8(3):145-57. PubMed ID: 10889899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Manipulations of irrelevant information: suffix effects with articulatory suppression and irrelevant speech. Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC; Neath I Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 10881609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The primacy model: a new model of immediate serial recall. Page MP; Norris D Psychol Rev; 1998 Oct; 105(4):761-81. PubMed ID: 9830378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Short-term memory for serial order: the Start-End Model. Henson RN Cogn Psychol; 1998 Jul; 36(2):73-137. PubMed ID: 9721198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Irrelevant speech eliminates the word length effect. Neath I; Surprenant AM; LeCompte DC Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 9584441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Individual differences in susceptibility to the "irrelevant speech effect". Ellermeier W; Zimmer K J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Oct; 102(4):2191-9. PubMed ID: 9348677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does articulatory suppression remove the irrelevant speech effect? Hanley JR Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 9231151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Articulatory rehearsal and phonological storage in working memory. Longoni AM; Richardson JT; Aiello A Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 8433641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Disruption of memory for lip-read lists by irrelevant speech: further support for the changing state hypothesis. Jones DM Q J Exp Psychol A; 1994 Feb; 47(1):143-60. PubMed ID: 8177959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The role of speech responses in short-term memory. Murray DJ Can J Psychol; 1967 Jun; 21(3):263-76. PubMed ID: 6045500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Baddeley AD Q J Exp Psychol; 1966 Nov; 18(4):362-5. PubMed ID: 5956080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. How does acoustic similarity influence short-term memory? Baddeley AD Q J Exp Psychol; 1968 Aug; 20(3):249-64. PubMed ID: 5683764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Experiments with the stimulus suffix effect. Morton J; Crowder RG; Prussin HA J Exp Psychol; 1971 Nov; 91(1):169-90. PubMed ID: 5126649 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A feature model of immediate memory. Nairne JS Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):251-69. PubMed ID: 2192233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Privileged access by irrelevant speech to short-term memory: the role of changing state. Jones D; Madden C; Miles C Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 May; 44(4):645-69. PubMed ID: 1615168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Mechanisms of auditory backward masking in the stimulus suffix effect. Crowder RG Psychol Rev; 1978 Nov; 85(6):502-24. PubMed ID: 734019 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: a test of the phonological loop model and the feature model. Hanley JR; Bakopoulou E Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Jun; 10(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 12921421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Neath I Psychon Bull Rev; 2000 Sep; 7(3):403-23. PubMed ID: 11082850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]