These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12921932)
1. Development of a clinical decision rule for triage of women with palpable breast masses. Reeves MJ; Osuch JR; Pathak DR J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 56(7):636-45. PubMed ID: 12921932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BREASTAID: Clinical results from early development of a clinical decision rule for palpable solid breast masses. Osuch JR; Reeves MJ; Pathak DR; Kinchelow T Ann Surg; 2003 Nov; 238(5):728-37. PubMed ID: 14578736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of abnormal mammography results and palpable breast abnormalities. Kerlikowske K; Smith-Bindman R; Ljung BM; Grady D Ann Intern Med; 2003 Aug; 139(4):274-84. PubMed ID: 12965983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Follow-up of palpable circumscribed noncalcified solid breast masses at mammography and US: can biopsy be averted? Graf O; Helbich TH; Fuchsjaeger MH; Hopf G; Morgun M; Graf C; Mallek R; Sickles EA Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):850-6. PubMed ID: 15486217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined fine-needle aspiration, physical examination and mammography in the diagnosis of palpable breast masses: their relation to outcome for women with primary breast cancer. Steinberg JL; Trudeau ME; Ryder DE; Fishell E; Chapman JA; McCready DR; Fish EB; Hiraki GY; Ross TM; Lickley LA Can J Surg; 1996 Aug; 39(4):302-11. PubMed ID: 8697321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the cost-effectiveness of the triple test score to traditional methods for evaluating palpable breast masses. Morris AM; Flowers CR; Morris KT; Schmidt WA; Pommier RF; Vetto JT Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):962-71. PubMed ID: 12886175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image guided versus palpation guided core needle biopsy of palpable breast masses: a prospective study. Hari S; Kumari S; Srivastava A; Thulkar S; Mathur S; Veedu PT Indian J Med Res; 2016 May; 143(5):597-604. PubMed ID: 27488003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of persistent palpable dominant breast masses. Hindle WH; Payne PA; Pan EY Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 168(6 Pt 1):1814-8; discussion 1818-9. PubMed ID: 8317526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified triple test for palpable breast masses: the value of ultrasound and core needle biopsy. Wai CJ; Al-Mubarak G; Homer MJ; Goldkamp A; Samenfeld-Specht M; Lee Y; Logvinenko T; Rothschild JG; Graham RA Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 20(3):850-5. PubMed ID: 23104707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses; discussion 1012-3. Morris KT; Pommier RF; Morris A; Schmidt WA; Beagle G; Alexander PW; Toth-Fejel S; Schmidt J; Vetto JT Arch Surg; 2001 Sep; 136(9):1008-12. PubMed ID: 11529822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate evaluation of palpable breast masses by the triple test score. Morris A; Pommier RF; Schmidt WA; Shih RL; Alexander PW; Vetto JT Arch Surg; 1998 Sep; 133(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 9749842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for diagnosis and management of palpable breast mass. Kanchanabat B; Kanchanapitak P; Thanapongsathorn W; Manomaiphiboon A Aust N Z J Surg; 2000 Nov; 70(11):791-4. PubMed ID: 11147439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Costs and effects of ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses. Flobbe K; Kessels AG; Severens JL; Beets GL; de Koning HJ; von Meyenfeld MF; van Engelshoven JM Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2004; 20(4):440-8. PubMed ID: 15609793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Ariga R; Bloom K; Reddy VB; Kluskens L; Francescatti D; Dowlat K; Siziopikou P; Gattuso P Am J Surg; 2002 Nov; 184(5):410-3. PubMed ID: 12433603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The value of aspiration cytology within the scope of triple diagnosis of palpable breast changes]. Schuhmann R; Hübner F; Brose C; Eckel S; Geier G; Kraus H; Schöndorf H; Schöndorf NK Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1995 Oct; 55(10):553-8. PubMed ID: 8543127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer]. Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of high frequency ultrasonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses in Chinese women: alternative to mammography? Yang WT; Mok CO; King W; Tang A; Metreweli C J Ultrasound Med; 1996 Sep; 15(9):637-44. PubMed ID: 8866446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast fine needle aspiration cytology. Utility as a screening tool for clinically palpable lesions. Costa MJ; Tadros T; Hilton G; Birdsong G Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(4):461-71. PubMed ID: 8328240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of palpable breast masses. Klein S Am Fam Physician; 2005 May; 71(9):1731-8. PubMed ID: 15887452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]