These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1292318)
1. The standard of care. Blumenreich GA AANA J; 1992 Dec; 60(6):529-31. PubMed ID: 1292318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The legal danger of written protocols and standards of practice. Moniz DM Nurse Pract; 1992 Sep; 17(9):58-60. PubMed ID: 1407771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Medical negligence: a chink in the armour of the Bolam test? Harpwood V Med Leg J; 1996; 64 ( Pt 4)():179-85. PubMed ID: 9050304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The changing face of medical negligence law: from Bolam to Bolitho. Sooriakumaran P Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2008 Jun; 69(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 18646413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Legal implications of standards of care. Clark AP; Garry MB Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1991; 10(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 2004584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The legal basis of expert testimony. Quigley FM Focus Crit Care; 1991 Aug; 18(4):307-8, 310. PubMed ID: 1874332 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comment on the doctor and hospital responsibility. Miller JM Md Med J; 1990 Mar; 39(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 2319915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal implications of clinical practice guidelines. Keyes GG J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):795-800. PubMed ID: 8708283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The medical expert witness: legal and ethical issues. Hirsch P Clin Dermatol; 2010 Mar; 28(2):240-2. PubMed ID: 20347668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal aspects of the AHCPR pressure ulcer guidelines. Hastings KE Decubitus; 1991 May; 4(2):36-8. PubMed ID: 2036167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ruling bolsters status of podiatrists. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1979 Jul; 9(7):78, 80. PubMed ID: 449870 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Medico-legal evaluation of unfavorable outcomes in medical practice]. Gromov AP Sov Med; 1990; (7):3-11. PubMed ID: 2251559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The expert medical witness. Roberts DK J Kans Med Soc; 1984 Dec; 85(12):335-6, 339. PubMed ID: 6520535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistics, not experts. Meadow W; Sunstein CR Duke Law J; 2001 Nov; 51(2):629-46. PubMed ID: 11963938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Professional liability. Mandell MS R I Med J (1976); 1984 Jun; 67(6):279-81. PubMed ID: 6588448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Complications of surgical treatment of retinal detachment in forensic expert testimony]. Mondelski S Klin Oczna; 1985 Feb; 87(2):66-7. PubMed ID: 4032972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Forensic medical expertise in connection with professional violations of the law by pediatricians]. Plaksin VO; Tabolin VA; Rostoshinskiĭ EN Sud Med Ekspert; 1994; 37(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 8009550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN. Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The law and your profession. Brown CE J Pract Nurs; 1990 Jun; 40(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 2366207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]