These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12924581)

  • 1. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting potential ecological hazard of organic chemicals for use in regulatory risk assessments.
    Comber MH; Walker JD; Watts C; Hermens J
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1822-8. PubMed ID: 12924581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An overview of the use of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ranking and prioritizing large chemical inventories for environmental risk assessments.
    Russom CL; Breton RL; Walker JD; Bradbury SP
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1810-21. PubMed ID: 12924580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. QSARs for identifying and prioritizing substances with persistence and bioconcentration potential.
    Walker JD; Carlsen L
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Dec; 13(7-8):713-25. PubMed ID: 12570048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
    Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QSAR modeling of cumulative environmental end-points for the prioritization of hazardous chemicals.
    Gramatica P; Papa E; Sangion A
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2018 Jan; 20(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 29226926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure-activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals.
    Bradbury SP; Russom CL; Ankley GT; Schultz TW; Walker JD
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1789-98. PubMed ID: 12924578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Guidelines for developing and using quantitative structure-activity relationships.
    Walker JD; Jaworska J; Comber MH; Schultz TW; Dearden JC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1653-65. PubMed ID: 12924568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Environmental hazard and risk assessment under the United States Toxic Substances Control Act.
    Nabholz JV
    Sci Total Environ; 1991 Dec; 109-110():649-65. PubMed ID: 1815379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for chemical reductions of organic contaminants.
    Tratnyek PG; Weber EJ; Schwarzenbach RP
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1733-42. PubMed ID: 12924574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mode of action and the assessment of chemical hazards in the presence of limited data: use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) under TSCA, Section 5.
    Auer CM; Nabholz JV; Baetcke KP
    Environ Health Perspect; 1990 Jul; 87():183-97. PubMed ID: 2269224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative structure-activity relationships for predicting skin and respiratory sensitization.
    Rodford R; Patlewicz G; Walker JD; Payne MP
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Aug; 22(8):1855-61. PubMed ID: 12924584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Next generation testing strategy for assessment of genomic damage: A conceptual framework and considerations.
    Dearfield KL; Gollapudi BB; Bemis JC; Benz RD; Douglas GR; Elespuru RK; Johnson GE; Kirkland DJ; LeBaron MJ; Li AP; Marchetti F; Pottenger LH; Rorije E; Tanir JY; Thybaud V; van Benthem J; Yauk CL; Zeiger E; Luijten M
    Environ Mol Mutagen; 2017 Jun; 58(5):264-283. PubMed ID: 27650663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. (Q)SARs: gatekeepers against risk on chemicals?
    Hulzebos EM; Posthumus R
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):285-316. PubMed ID: 14506871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Global government applications of analogues, SARs and QSARs to predict aquatic toxicity, chemical or physical properties, environmental fate parameters and health effects of organic chemicals.
    Walker JD; Carlsen L; Hulzebos E; Simon-Hettich B
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2002 Oct; 13(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 12479375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of QSARs and VFARs to the rapid risk assessment process at US EPA.
    Moudgal CJ; Young D; Nichols T; Martin T; Harten P; Venkatapathy R; Stelma G; Siddhanti S; Baier-Anderson C; Wolfe M
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2008; 19(5-6):579-87. PubMed ID: 18853303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The application of structure-activity relationships (SARs) in the aquatic toxicity evaluation of discrete organic chemicals.
    Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Zeeman MG; Auer CM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 8564855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict ecologic effects and environmental fate of chemical substances.
    Cronin MT; Walker JD; Jaworska JS; Comber MH; Watts CD; Worth AP
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1376-90. PubMed ID: 12896861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new quality assurance system for the evaluation of ecotoxicity studies submitted under the New Substances Notification Regulations in Canada.
    Breton RL; Gilron G; Thompson R; Rodney S; Teed S
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2009 Jan; 5(1):127-37. PubMed ID: 19431297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. History of EPI Suiteā„¢ and future perspectives on chemical property estimation in US Toxic Substances Control Act new chemical risk assessments.
    Card ML; Gomez-Alvarez V; Lee WH; Lynch DG; Orentas NS; Lee MT; Wong EM; Boethling RS
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2017 Mar; 19(3):203-212. PubMed ID: 28275775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.