274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12925515)
1. The distribution of loss in two-treatment biased-coin designs.
Atkinson AC
Biostatistics; 2003 Apr; 4(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 12925515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adaptive biased-coin designs for skewing the allocation proportion in clinical trials with normal responses.
Atkinson AC; Biswas A
Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(16):2477-92. PubMed ID: 16007571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preserving the allocation ratio at every allocation with biased coin randomization and minimization in studies with unequal allocation.
Kuznetsova OM; Tymofyeyev Y
Stat Med; 2012 Apr; 31(8):701-23. PubMed ID: 22161821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response adaptive designs with a variance-penalized criterion.
Yi Y; Wang X
Biom J; 2009 Oct; 51(5):763-73. PubMed ID: 19757432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bayesian adaptive biased-coin designs for clinical trials with normal responses.
Atkinson AC; Biswas A
Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):118-25. PubMed ID: 15737084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adaptive biased urn randomization in small strata when blinding is impossible.
Schouten HJ
Biometrics; 1995 Dec; 51(4):1529-35. PubMed ID: 8589238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimation of a parameter and its exact confidence interval following sequential sample size reestimation trials.
Cheng Y; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 15606411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Selection and bias--two hostile brothers.
Bauer P; Koenig F; Brannath W; Posch M
Stat Med; 2010 Jan; 29(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19844944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-parametric estimators of a monotonic dose-response curve and bootstrap confidence intervals.
Dilleen M; Heimann G; Hirsch I
Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(6):869-82. PubMed ID: 12627406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implementing a decision-theoretic design in clinical trials: why and how?
Palmer CR; Shahumyan H
Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):4939-57. PubMed ID: 17582801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive design and estimation in randomized clinical trials with correlated observations.
Yin G; Shen Y
Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):362-9. PubMed ID: 16011682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian decision-theoretic group sequential clinical trial design based on a quadratic loss function: a frequentist evaluation.
Lewis RJ; Lipsky AM; Berry DA
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 17327241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining optimal sample sizes for multi-stage randomized clinical trials using value of information methods.
Willan A; Kowgier M
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 18697843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomizing research participants: promoting balance and concealment in small samples.
Matthews EE; Cook PF; Terada M; Aloia MS
Res Nurs Health; 2010 Jun; 33(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 20499394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
