These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

331 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12925549)

  • 1. Measuring the impact of diagnostic decision support on the quality of clinical decision making: development of a reliable and valid composite score.
    Ramnarayan P; Kapoor RR; Coren M; Nanduri V; Tomlinson AL; Taylor PM; Wyatt JC; Britto JF
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):563-72. PubMed ID: 12925549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measuring the quality of diagnostic hypothesis sets for studies of decision support.
    Friedman C; Elstein A; Wolf F; Murphy G; Franz T; Fine P; Heckerling P; Miller T
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():864-8. PubMed ID: 10384584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic omission errors in acute paediatric practice: impact of a reminder system on decision-making.
    Ramnarayan P; Winrow A; Coren M; Nanduri V; Buchdahl R; Jacobs B; Fisher H; Taylor PM; Wyatt JC; Britto J
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Nov; 6():37. PubMed ID: 17087835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The IDEA Assessment Tool: Assessing the Reporting, Diagnostic Reasoning, and Decision-Making Skills Demonstrated in Medical Students' Hospital Admission Notes.
    Baker EA; Ledford CH; Fogg L; Way DP; Park YS
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 25893938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of a diagnostic reminder system in emergency medicine: a multi-centre study.
    Ramnarayan P; Cronje N; Brown R; Negus R; Coode B; Moss P; Hassan T; Hamer W; Britto J
    Emerg Med J; 2007 Sep; 24(9):619-24. PubMed ID: 17711936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the potential impact of a reminder system on the reduction of diagnostic errors: a quasi-experimental study.
    Ramnarayan P; Roberts GC; Coren M; Nanduri V; Tomlinson A; Taylor PM; Wyatt JC; Britto JF
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Apr; 6():22. PubMed ID: 16646956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative impact of guidelines, clinical data, and decision support on prescribing decisions: an interactive web experiment with simulated cases.
    Sintchenko V; Coiera E; Iredell JR; Gilbert GL
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 14527970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring the quality of preventive and developmental services for young children: national estimates and patterns of clinicians' performance.
    Bethell C; Reuland CH; Halfon N; Schor EL
    Pediatrics; 2004 Jun; 113(6 Suppl):1973-83. PubMed ID: 15173469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating online diagnostic decision support tools for the clinical setting.
    Pryor M; White D; Potter B; Traill R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 178():180-5. PubMed ID: 22797039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Critical incidents and journey mapping as techniques to evaluate the impact of online evidence retrieval systems on health care delivery and patient outcomes.
    Westbrook JI; Coiera EW; Sophie Gosling A; Braithwaite J
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):234-45. PubMed ID: 16798071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a tool to measure and promote clinical teamwork.
    Guise JM; Deering SH; Kanki BG; Osterweil P; Li H; Mori M; Lowe NK
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(4):217-23. PubMed ID: 19088666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an Internet delivered pediatric diagnosis support system (ISABEL) in a tertiary care center in India.
    Bavdekar SB; Pawar M
    Indian Pediatr; 2005 Nov; 42(11):1086-91. PubMed ID: 16340049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel diagnostic aid (ISABEL): development and preliminary evaluation of clinical performance.
    Ramnarayan P; Tomlinson A; Kulkarni G; Rao A; Britto J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1091-5. PubMed ID: 15360981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Design and testing of a tool for evaluating the quality of diabetes consumer-information Web sites.
    Seidman JJ; Steinwachs D; Rubin HR
    J Med Internet Res; 2003 Nov; 5(4):e30. PubMed ID: 14713658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of a diagnostic reminder system on student clinical reasoning during simulated case studies.
    Carlson J; Abel M; Bridges D; Tomkowiak J
    Simul Healthc; 2011 Feb; 6(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 21330845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Medical decision support via the internet: PROforma and Solo.
    Humber M; Butterworth H; Fox J; Thomson R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):464-8. PubMed ID: 11604783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linking evidence-based medicine therapeutic summary measures to clinical decision analysis.
    Djulbegovic B; Hozo I; Lyman GH
    MedGenMed; 2000 Jan; 2(1):E6. PubMed ID: 11104452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are clinicians correct when they believe they are correct? Implications for medical decision support.
    Friedman C; Gatti G; Elstein A; Franz T; Murphy G; Wolf F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):454-8. PubMed ID: 11604781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Medical informatics and clinical decision making: the science and the pragmatics.
    Shortliffe EH
    Med Decis Making; 1991; 11(4 Suppl):S2-14. PubMed ID: 1837576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.