These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12925550)

  • 1. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12925550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No paper, but the same routines: a qualitative exploration of experiences in two Norwegian hospitals deprived of the paper based medical record.
    Lium JT; Tjora A; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jan; 8():2. PubMed ID: 18186935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of and attitudes to a hospital information system by medical secretaries, nurses and physicians deprived of the paper-based medical record: a case report.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2004 Oct; 4():18. PubMed ID: 15488150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals.
    Lium JT; Laerum H; Schulz T; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2006; 13(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 16929040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow.
    Lium JT; Faxvaag A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 124():1031-6. PubMed ID: 17108645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physician and nurse satisfaction with an Electronic Medical Record system.
    Likourezos A; Chalfin DB; Murphy DG; Sommer B; Darcy K; Davidson SJ
    J Emerg Med; 2004 Nov; 27(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 15498630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006.
    Hing ES; Burt CW; Woodwell DA
    Adv Data; 2007 Oct; (393):1-7. PubMed ID: 18019786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. If electronic medical records are so great, why aren't family physicians using them?
    Loomis GA; Ries JS; Saywell RM; Thakker NR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 12160503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pre-post evaluation of physicians' satisfaction with a redesigned electronic medical record system.
    Jaspers MW; Peute LW; Lauteslager A; Bakker PJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():303-8. PubMed ID: 18487748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National questionnaire study on clinical ICT systems proofs: physicians suffer from poor usability.
    Viitanen J; Hyppönen H; Lääveri T; Vänskä J; Reponen J; Winblad I
    Int J Med Inform; 2011 Oct; 80(10):708-25. PubMed ID: 21784701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electronic medical record systems in Israel's public hospitals.
    Lejbkowicz I; Denekamp Y; Reis S; Goldenberg D
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2004 Oct; 6(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 15473582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready?
    Dansky KH; Gamm LD; Vasey JJ; Barsukiewicz CK
    J Healthc Manag; 1999; 44(6):440-54; discussion 454-5. PubMed ID: 10662431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions.
    Miller RH; Sim I
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2004; 23(2):116-26. PubMed ID: 15046136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
    Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The user in the design process of an EPR.
    van der Meijden MJ; Tange HJ; Boiten J; Troost J; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():224-8. PubMed ID: 11187546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a patient-accessible electronic medical record in a practice for congestive heart failure: patient and physician experiences.
    Earnest MA; Ross SE; Wittevrongel L; Moore LA; Lin CT
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(5):410-7. PubMed ID: 15187074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Electronic medical records in somatic hospitals--availability and clinical use].
    Laerum H; Ellingsen G; Faxvaag A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2002 Oct; 122(26):2540-3. PubMed ID: 12522880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physicians' and nurses' reactions to electronic medical records. Managerial and occupational implications.
    Darr A; Harrison MI; Shakked L; Shalom N
    J Health Organ Manag; 2003; 17(5):349-59. PubMed ID: 14628488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.