These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

661 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12925857)

  • 1. Optimizing outcomes in breast augmentation: seven years of experience with the subfascial plane.
    Góes JC; Landecker A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 12925857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages and outcomes in subfascial breast augmentation: a two-year review of experience.
    Siclovan HR; Jomah JA
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2008 May; 32(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 18365270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Tear-drop augmentation mastopexy": a technique to augment superior pole hollow.
    Ceydeli A; Freund RM
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2003; 27(6):425-32; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 14994167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Augmentation mammaplasty: where should the implant be placed?
    Takayanagi S; Nakagawa C; Sugimoto Y
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 15170249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast implant stability in the subfascial plane and the new shaped silicone gel breast implants.
    Sampaio Góes JC
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 19936826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maximizing the use of precapsular space and the choice of implant type in breast augmentation mammaplasty revisions: review of 49 consecutive procedures and patient satisfaction assessment.
    Castello MF; Lazzeri D; Silvestri A; Agostini T; Pascone C; Marcelli C; Gigliotti D; D'Aniello C; Gasparotti M
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Oct; 35(5):828-38. PubMed ID: 21455821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective study comparing two brands of cohesive gel breast implants with anatomic shape: 5-year follow-up evaluation.
    Niechajev I; Jurell G; Lohjelm L
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2007; 31(6):697-710. PubMed ID: 17653683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Transaxillary dual-plane augmentation mammaplasty: experience with 98 breasts.
    Luan J; Mu D; Mu L
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2009 Nov; 62(11):1459-63. PubMed ID: 18838324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).
    Riggio E
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2012 Aug; 36(4):866-78. PubMed ID: 22484397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-stage augmentation combined with mastopexy: aesthetic results and patient satisfaction.
    Spear SL; Pelletiere CV; Menon N
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):259-67. PubMed ID: 15529204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast augmentation, antibiotic prophylaxis, and infection: comparative analysis of 1,628 primary augmentation mammoplasties assessing the role and efficacy of antibiotics prophylaxis duration.
    Khan UD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Feb; 34(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 19841968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.
    Namnoum JD; Largent J; Kaplan HM; Oefelein MG; Brown MH
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1165-72. PubMed ID: 23664574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Endoscopic-assisted transaxillary breast augmentation: minimizing complications and maximizing results with improvements in patient selection and technique.
    Kolker AR; Austen WG; Slavin SA
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 May; 64(5):667-73. PubMed ID: 20395798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A technique to decrease breast shape deformity during muscle contraction in submuscular augmentation mammaplasty.
    Pelle-Ceravolo M; Del Vescovo A; Bertozzi E; Molinari P
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2004; 28(5):288-94. PubMed ID: 15666044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Transaxillary dual-plane breast augmentation with endoscope assistant].
    Luan J; Mu DL; Mu L; Liu C; Zhang ZQ
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 25(3):175-7. PubMed ID: 19803195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Double breast contour in primary aesthetic breast augmentation: incidence, prevention and treatment.
    Médard de Chardon V; Balaguer T; Chignon-Sicard B; Lebreton E
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Apr; 64(4):390-6. PubMed ID: 20224340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: technique and outcomes.
    Spear SL; Carter ME; Ganz JC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Aug; 112(2):456-66. PubMed ID: 12900603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective comparison of subglandular, subfascial, and submuscular implant insertion.
    Pereira LH; Sterodimas A
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Sep; 33(5):752-9. PubMed ID: 19597863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preliminary (3 years) experience with smooth wall silicone gel implants for primary breast augmentation.
    Seify H; Sullivan K; Hester TR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2005 Mar; 54(3):231-5; discussion 235. PubMed ID: 15725819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Subfascial breast augmentation: a comprehensive experience.
    Hunstad JP; Webb LS
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 34(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 20112016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.