These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12926663)

  • 1. Upgrading the Sjölunda WWTP according to a novel process concept.
    Hanner N; Aspegren H; Nyberg U; Andersson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 12926663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Phased upgrading for nitrogen removal--a low cost approach.
    Solley D; Armstrong M
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):157-63. PubMed ID: 12906285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Autotrophic nitrogen removal in sequencing batch biofilm reactors at different oxygen supply modes.
    Wantawin C; Juateea J; Noophan PL; Munakata-Marr J
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):1889-94. PubMed ID: 19039166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing the total discharge from a large WWTP by separate treatment of primary effluent overflow.
    Hanner N; Mattsson A; Gruvberger C; Nyberg U; Aspegren H; Fredriksson O; Nordqvist A; Andersson B
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):157-62. PubMed ID: 15553471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Partial nitrification in a high-load activated sludge system by biofilter backwash water recirculation.
    Melicz Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):93-9. PubMed ID: 12906276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance evaluation of hybrid and conventional sequencing batch reactor and continuous processes.
    Tam HL; Tang DT; Leung WY; Ho KM; Greenfield PF
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(10):59-65. PubMed ID: 15656296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trickling filters for upgrading low technology wastewater plants for nitrogen removal.
    Pearce P
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):47-52. PubMed ID: 15303722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimisation of Noosa BNR plant to improve performance and reduce operating costs.
    Thomas M; Wright P; Blackall L; Urbain V; Keller J
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):141-8. PubMed ID: 12926681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Feasibility of nitrification/denitrification in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor with liquid circulation applied to post-treatment.
    Andrade do Canto CS; Rodrigues JA; Ratusznei SM; Zaiat M; Foresti E
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Feb; 99(3):644-54. PubMed ID: 17336516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of intermittently aerated continuous and batch biofilm reactor in nutrient removal.
    Altinbaş U; Oztürk I
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):371-6. PubMed ID: 14753558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus with A2/O process using immobilized media.
    Goto M; Kuribayashi S; Nonaka Y; Yamazaki M
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(11-12):113-9. PubMed ID: 12523741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The ScanDeNi process could turn an existing under-performing activated sludge plant into an asset.
    Rosén S; Huijbregsen C
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):31-6. PubMed ID: 12906268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance of a hybrid SBR with fixed bed and suspended growth.
    Kim H; Rhu D; Hwang H; Choi E
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(11-12):309-17. PubMed ID: 14753551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experiences with a large-size WWTP based on activated sludge-biofiltration processes: 25 months of operation.
    Licskó I; Szabó GC; Melicz Z
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):285-93. PubMed ID: 15537018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement of nitrogen removal at WWTP Zürich Werdhöelzli after connection of WWTP Zürich-Glatt.
    Siegrist H; Rieger L; Fux Ch; Wehrli M
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):35-43. PubMed ID: 15553456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nitrogen removal during leachate treatment: comparison of simple and sophisticated systems.
    Vasel JL; Jupsin H; Annachhatre AP
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(6):45-52. PubMed ID: 15536989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced nitrogen removal using C/N load adjustment and real-time control strategy in sequencing batch reactors for swine wastewater treatment.
    Chen M; Kim JH; Kishida N; Nishimura O; Sudo R
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):309-14. PubMed ID: 15137439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Six years of operation of a fluidised bed reactor for denitrification.
    Harri A; Bosander J
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(7):97-103. PubMed ID: 15553464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
    Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Boosting nitrification with the BABE technology.
    Berends DH; Salem S; van der Roest HF; van Loosdrecht MC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(4):63-70. PubMed ID: 16235747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.