605 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12926681)
1. Optimisation of Noosa BNR plant to improve performance and reduce operating costs.
Thomas M; Wright P; Blackall L; Urbain V; Keller J
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):141-8. PubMed ID: 12926681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The secret to achieving reliable biological phosphorus removal.
Thomas MP
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(6):1231-6. PubMed ID: 18845861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biological nutrient removal in membrane bioreactors: denitrification and phosphorus removal kinetics.
Parco V; du Toit G; Wentzel M; Ekama G
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):125-34. PubMed ID: 17898451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of GAOs (glycogen accumulating organisms) on anaerobic carbon requirements in full-scale Australian EBPR (enhanced biological phosphorus removal) plants.
Saunders AM; Oehmen A; Blackall LL; Yuan Z; Keller J
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):37-43. PubMed ID: 12906269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using sludge fermentation liquid to improve wastewater short-cut nitrification-denitrification and denitrifying phosphorus removal via nitrite.
Ji Z; Chen Y
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):8957-63. PubMed ID: 21053972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of a 2-year investigation on enhanced biological nutrients removal and trace organics elimination in membrane bioreactor (MBR).
Lesjean B; Gnirss R; Buisson H; Keller S; Tazi-Pain A; Luck F
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):453-60. PubMed ID: 16459821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Advancing post-anoxic denitrification for biological nutrient removal.
Winkler M; Coats ER; Brinkman CK
Water Res; 2011 Nov; 45(18):6119-30. PubMed ID: 21937071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of acetate and propionate uptake by polyphosphate accumulating organisms and glycogen accumulating organisms.
Oehmen A; Yuan Z; Blackall LL; Keller J
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Jul; 91(2):162-8. PubMed ID: 15892052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in UCT-type MBR process.
Lee H; Han J; Yun Z
Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(11):2093-9. PubMed ID: 19494447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phased upgrading for nitrogen removal--a low cost approach.
Solley D; Armstrong M
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):157-63. PubMed ID: 12906285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of prefermentation on denitrifying phosphorus removal in slaughterhouse wastewater.
Merzouki M; Bernet N; Delgenès JP; Benlemlih M
Bioresour Technol; 2005 Aug; 96(12):1317-22. PubMed ID: 15792577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anaerobic/oxic/anoxic granular sludge process as an effective nutrient removal process utilizing denitrifying polyphosphate-accumulating organisms.
Kishida N; Kim J; Tsuneda S; Sudo R
Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2303-10. PubMed ID: 16766009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A sequencing batch reactor system for high-level biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal from abattoir wastewater.
Lemaire R; Yuan Z; Bernet N; Marcos M; Yilmaz G; Keller J
Biodegradation; 2009 Jun; 20(3):339-50. PubMed ID: 18937035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of the full-scale biological nutrient removal plant at Noosa in Queensland, Australia: nutrient removal and disinfection.
Urbain V; Wright P; Thomas M
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(2-3):57-62. PubMed ID: 11548021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvement of denitrification by denitrifying phosphorus removing bacteria using sequentially combined carbon.
Cho ES; Ahn KH; Molof AH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(8):33-40. PubMed ID: 15566184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ScanDeNi process could turn an existing under-performing activated sludge plant into an asset.
Rosén S; Huijbregsen C
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):31-6. PubMed ID: 12906268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative estimation of the role of denitrifying phosphate accumulating organisms in nutrient removal.
Shoji T; Satoh H; Mino T
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(11):23-9. PubMed ID: 12906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Competition between polyphosphate and glycogen accumulating organisms in enhanced biological phosphorus removal systems with acetate and propionate as carbon sources.
Oehmen A; Saunders AM; Vives MT; Yuan Z; Keller J
J Biotechnol; 2006 May; 123(1):22-32. PubMed ID: 16293332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of sequentially combined carbon with sole carbon in denitrification and biological phosphorus removal.
Cho ES; Ahn KH; Molof AH
Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):251-6. PubMed ID: 15137431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
