BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

621 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12926777)

  • 1. A comparison via simulation of least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimators of two variances and heritability with those of restricted maximum likelihood.
    Slanger WD; Carlson JK
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Aug; 81(8):1950-8. PubMed ID: 12926777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection.
    Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Least squares Lehmann-Scheffé estimation of variances and covariances with mixed linear models.
    Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2577-85. PubMed ID: 8923172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-herd heritability estimated with daughter-parent regression for yield and somatic cell score.
    Dechow CD; Norman HD
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):482-92. PubMed ID: 17183117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood.
    Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling distributions, biases, variances, and confidence intervals for genetic correlations.
    Liu BH; Knapp SJ; Birkes D
    Theor Appl Genet; 1997 Jan; 94(1):8-19. PubMed ID: 19352739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inclusion of sire by herd interaction effect in the genomic evaluation for weaning weight of American Angus.
    Jang S; Lourenco D; Miller S
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Mar; 100(3):. PubMed ID: 35213718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Symmetric differences squared and analysis of variance procedures for estimating genetic and environmental variances and covariances for beef cattle weaning weight: II. Estimates from a data set.
    Bruckner CM; Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Dec; 63(6):1794-803. PubMed ID: 3818460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Closed-form approximations to the REML estimator of a variance ratio (or heritability) in a mixed linear model.
    Burch BD; Harris IR
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1148-56. PubMed ID: 11764255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetric differences squared and analysis of variance procedures for estimating genetic and environmental variances and covariances for beef cattle weaning weight: I. Comparison via simulation.
    Bruckner CM; Slanger WD
    J Anim Sci; 1986 Dec; 63(6):1779-93. PubMed ID: 3818459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating sampling error of evolutionary statistics based on genetic covariance matrices using maximum likelihood.
    Houle D; Meyer K
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Aug; 28(8):1542-9. PubMed ID: 26079756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multilevel bootstrap analysis with assumptions violated.
    Vallejo Seco G; Ato García M; Fernández García MP; Livacic Rojas PE
    Psicothema; 2013; 25(4):520-8. PubMed ID: 24124787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of REML and Gibbs sampling estimates of multi-trait genetic parameters in Scots pine.
    Waldmann P; Ericsson T
    Theor Appl Genet; 2006 May; 112(8):1441-51. PubMed ID: 16544126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating variance parameters from multivariate normal variables subject to limit of detection: MLE, REML, or Bayesian approaches?
    Nie L; Chu H; Feng S
    Stat Med; 2009 Sep; 28(20):2605-16. PubMed ID: 19598183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in expectation maximization restricted maximum likelihood estimation of the linear mixed model.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Dec; 129(6):457-68. PubMed ID: 23148971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. REHE: Fast variance components estimation for linear mixed models.
    Yue K; Ma J; Thornton T; Shojaie A
    Genet Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 45(8):891-905. PubMed ID: 34658056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Non-iterative variance component estimation in QTL analysis.
    Rönnegård L; Al-Sarraj R; von Rosen D
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Apr; 126(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 19320767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A robust DF-REML framework for variance components estimation in genetic studies.
    Lourenço VM; Rodrigues PC; Pires AM; Piepho HP
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Nov; 33(22):3584-3594. PubMed ID: 29036274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    Stat Med; 2007 Apr; 26(9):1964-81. PubMed ID: 16955539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.