These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12927360)

  • 1. How accurate are the European Union's classifications of chemical substances.
    Rudén C; Hansson SO
    Toxicol Lett; 2003 Sep; 144(2):159-72. PubMed ID: 12927360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can acute dermal systemic toxicity tests be replaced with oral tests? A comparison of route-specific systemic toxicity and hazard classifications under the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS).
    Moore NP; Andrew DJ; Bjerke DL; Creton S; Dreher D; Holmes T; Prieto P; Seidle T; Rowan TG
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Jun; 66(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 23461858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ISS Dangerous Substances Classification and Labelling Database.
    Di Prospero Fanghella P; Izzo P; Morassi E
    Ann Ist Super Sanita; 2008; 44(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 18469373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The European Community Directive on the classification and labeling of chemicals for reproductive toxicity.
    Sullivan FM
    J Occup Environ Med; 1995 Aug; 37(8):966-9. PubMed ID: 8520962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ECVAM, ECETOC and the EU chemicals policy.
    Botham PA
    Altern Lab Anim; 2002 Dec; 30 Suppl 2():185-7. PubMed ID: 12513671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hazard classification of chemicals inducing haemolytic anaemia: An EU regulatory perspective.
    Muller A; Jacobsen H; Healy E; McMickan S; Istace F; Blaude MN; Howden P; Fleig H; Schulte A;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2006 Aug; 45(3):229-41. PubMed ID: 16793184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Options for Deriving Chemical Ecotoxicity Hazard Values for the European Union Environmental Footprint, Part II.
    Saouter E; Wolff D; Biganzoli F; Versteeg D
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2019 Sep; 15(5):796-807. PubMed ID: 31115961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the risk decision process.
    Höfer T
    Toxicology; 2006 May; 222(1-2):154-5; author reply 156-9. PubMed ID: 16487646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The development of the globally harmonized system (GHS) of classification and labelling of hazardous chemicals.
    Winder C; Azzi R; Wagner D
    J Hazard Mater; 2005 Oct; 125(1-3):29-44. PubMed ID: 16039045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The European Union's REACH regulation: a review of its history and requirements.
    Williams ES; Panko J; Paustenbach DJ
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2009; 39(7):553-75. PubMed ID: 19650717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of approaches for terrestrial hazard classification.
    Renaud FG; Boxall AB; Toy R; Robertson S
    Chemosphere; 2004 Dec; 57(11):1697-706. PubMed ID: 15519416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best practices for developmental toxicity assessment for classification and labeling.
    Daston G; Piersma A; Attias L; Beekhuijzen M; Chen C; Foreman J; Hallmark N; Leconte I
    Reprod Toxicol; 2018 Sep; 80():44-48. PubMed ID: 29753929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biometrical evaluation of the OECD modified version of the acute toxic class method (oral).
    Diener W; Mischke U; Schlede E; Kayser D
    Arch Toxicol; 1995; 69(10):729-34. PubMed ID: 8572934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The skin notation in the MAC list and classification of dangerous chemicals.
    Kupczewska-Dobecka M; Czerczak S
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2006; 19(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 17128805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the thresholds of toxicological concern values using a new database for food-related substances.
    Reilly L; Serafimova R; Partosch F; Gundert-Remy U; Cortiñas Abrahantes J; Dorne JMC; Kass GEN
    Toxicol Lett; 2019 Oct; 314():117-123. PubMed ID: 31325634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Background of REACH in EU regulations on evaluation of chemicals.
    Foth H; Hayes A
    Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 27(6):443-61. PubMed ID: 18784197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toxicity classification of e-cigarette flavouring compounds based on European Union regulation: analysis of findings from a recent study.
    Farsalinos K; Lagoumintzis G
    Harm Reduct J; 2019 Jul; 16(1):48. PubMed ID: 31345235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regulatory assessment of chemicals within OECD member countries, EU and in Russia.
    Fjodorova N; Novich M; Vrachko M; Kharchevnikova N; Zholdakova Z; Sinitsyna O; Benfenati E
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2008; 26(1):40-88. PubMed ID: 18322867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A GHS-consistent approach to health hazard classification of petroleum substances, a class of UVCB substances.
    Clark CR; McKee RH; Freeman JJ; Swick D; Mahagaokar S; Pigram G; Roberts LG; Smulders CJ; Beatty PW
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24025648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transparency of chemical risk assessment data under REACH.
    Ingre-Khans E; Ågerstrand M; Beronius A; Rudén C
    Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2016 Dec; 18(12):1508-1518. PubMed ID: 27819710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.