119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12927555)
1. Extrapolating ecotoxicological measures from small data sets.
Pennington DW
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2003 Oct; 56(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 12927555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.
Maltby L; Blake N; Brock TC; van den Brink PJ
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2005 Feb; 24(2):379-88. PubMed ID: 15719998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliable and representative in silico predictions of freshwater ecotoxicological hazardous concentrations.
Douziech M; Ragas AMJ; van Zelm R; Oldenkamp R; Jan Hendriks A; King H; Oktivaningrum R; Huijbregts MAJ
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105334. PubMed ID: 31760260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions.
Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Feb; 23(2):489-99. PubMed ID: 14982398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute-to-chronic species sensitivity distribution extrapolation.
Duboudin C; Ciffroy P; Magaud H
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Jul; 23(7):1774-85. PubMed ID: 15230330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Environmental benchmarks based on ecotoxicological assessment with planktonic species might not adequately protect benthic assemblages in lotic systems.
Vidal T; Santos JI; Queirós L; Ré A; Abrantes N; Gonçalves FJM; Pereira JL
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 668():1289-1297. PubMed ID: 31018468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimating the 5-percentile of the species sensitivity distributions without any assumptions about the distribution.
van der Hoeven N
Ecotoxicology; 2001 Feb; 10(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11227815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.
Aldenberg T; Jaworska JS
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2000 May; 46(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 10805987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating hazardous concentrations by an informative Bayesian approach.
Ciffroy P; Keller M; Pasanisi A
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Mar; 32(3):602-11. PubMed ID: 23280589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.
Wigger H; Kawecki D; Nowack B; Adam V
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2020 Mar; 16(2):211-222. PubMed ID: 31535755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Species sensitivity distribution for pentachlorophenol to aquatic organisms based on interval ecotoxicological data.
Zhao J; Zhang R
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2017 Nov; 145():193-199. PubMed ID: 28734222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the application of loss functions in determining assessment factors for ecological risk.
Hickey GL; Craig PS; Hart A
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2009 Feb; 72(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 18691758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Estimation of hazardous concentration of toluene in the terrestrial ecosystem through the species sensitivity distribution approach.
Chae Y; Kim L; Lee J; Kim D; Cui R; An YJ
Environ Pollut; 2021 Nov; 289():117836. PubMed ID: 34340185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A methodology for ecosystem-scale modeling of selenium.
Presser TS; Luoma SN
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2010 Oct; 6(4):685-710. PubMed ID: 20872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Critical issues in using the common mixture toxicity models concentration addition or response addition on species sensitivity distributions: a theoretical approach.
Gregorio V; Chèvre N; Junghans M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2013 Oct; 32(10):2387-95. PubMed ID: 23804417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aquatic ecotoxicological indicators in life-cycle assessment.
Pennington DW; Payet J; Hauschild M
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2004 Jul; 23(7):1796-807. PubMed ID: 15230332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aquatic risk assessment of a novel strobilurin fungicide: A microcosm study compared with the species sensitivity distribution approach.
Chen L; Song Y; Tang B; Song X; Yang H; Li B; Zhao Y; Huang C; Han X; Wang S; Li Z
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Oct; 120():418-27. PubMed ID: 26122735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing predictive uncertainty in comparative toxicity potentials of triazoles.
Golsteijn L; Iqbal MS; Cassani S; Hendriks HW; Kovarich S; Papa E; Rorije E; Sahlin U; Huijbregts MA
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Feb; 33(2):293-301. PubMed ID: 24122976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Augmenting aquatic species sensitivity distributions with interspecies toxicity estimation models.
Awkerman JA; Raimondo S; Jackson CR; Barron MG
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2014 Mar; 33(3):688-95. PubMed ID: 24214839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A probabilistic method for species sensitivity distributions taking into account the inherent uncertainty and variability of effects to estimate environmental risk.
Gottschalk F; Nowack B
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Jan; 9(1):79-86. PubMed ID: 22745057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
