These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12928091)

  • 1. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy (the Shaker technique): an alternative for assessment of supraesophageal complications of gastroesophageal reflux.
    Saeian K
    Am J Med; 2003 Aug; 115 Suppl 3A():144S-149S. PubMed ID: 12928091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy.
    Shaker R; Saeian K
    Am J Med; 2001 Dec; 111 Suppl 8A():153S-156S. PubMed ID: 11749942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a Canadian experience in daily practice.
    Cho S; Arya N; Swan K; Cirocco M; Kandel G; Kortan P; Marcon N
    Can J Gastroenterol; 2008 Mar; 22(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 18354752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a view of the future.
    Christianson JM
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 1999; 22(6):233-5. PubMed ID: 10855118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
    Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
    Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.
    Dean R; Dua K; Massey B; Berger W; Hogan WJ; Shaker R
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Oct; 44(4):422-4. PubMed ID: 8905361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unsedated transnasal versus transoral sedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a one-series prospective study on safety and patient acceptability.
    Stroppa I; Grasso E; Paoluzi OA; Razzini C; Tosti C; Andrei F; Biancone L; Palmieri G; Romeo F; Pallone F
    Dig Liver Dis; 2008 Sep; 40(9):767-75. PubMed ID: 18424197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
    Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
    Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unsedated small-caliber upper endoscopy: an emerging diagnostic and therapeutic technology.
    Kim CY; O'Rourke RW; Chang EY; Jobe BA
    Surg Innov; 2006 Mar; 13(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 16708153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of transnasal and transoral oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.
    Bampton PA; Reid DP; Johnson RD; Fitch RJ; Dent J
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Jun; 13(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 9715399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Utility of unsedated transnasal endoscopy for pharyngeal observation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. A prospective study to assess cardiopulmonary function.
    Tsuboi M; Arai M; Maruoka D; Matsumura T; Nakagawa T; Katsuno T; Yokosuka O
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):884-9. PubMed ID: 23731392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A study comparing tolerability, satisfaction and acceptance of three different techniques for esophageal endoscopy: sedated conventional, unsedated peroral ultra thin, and esophageal capsule.
    Nakos G; Karagiannis S; Ballas S; Galanis P; Alevizopoulos G; Nakos A; Mavrogiannis C
    Dis Esophagus; 2009; 22(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 19191853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
    Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
    Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and color coding system of intellectual pathology of the mucous membrane in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease].
    Starodubtsev VA; Polosin AV; Kupriianov MP; Akhunova DM; Berezina NP; Baulin AA; Baulin VA; Shcherbakov PL
    Eksp Klin Gastroenterol; 2010; (10):55-8. PubMed ID: 21434373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Office-based unsedated small-caliber endoscopy is equivalent to conventional sedated endoscopy in screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus: a randomized and blinded comparison.
    Jobe BA; Hunter JG; Chang EY; Kim CY; Eisen GM; Robinson JD; Diggs BS; O'Rourke RW; Rader AE; Schipper P; Sauer DA; Peters JH; Lieberman DA; Morris CD
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2006 Dec; 101(12):2693-703. PubMed ID: 17227516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
    Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unsedated transnasal ultrathin esophagogastroduodenoscopy may provide better diagnostic performance in gastroesophageal reflux disease.
    Mori A; Ohashi N; Yoshida A; Nozaki M; Tatebe H; Okuno M; Hoshihara Y; Hongo M
    Dis Esophagus; 2011 Feb; 24(2):92-8. PubMed ID: 20659140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Garcia RT; Cello JP; Nguyen MH; Rogers SJ; Rodas A; Trinh HN; Stollman NH; Schlueck G; McQuaid KR
    Gastroenterology; 2003 Dec; 125(6):1606-12. PubMed ID: 14724812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective comparison between sedated high-definition oral and unsedated ultrathin transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy in the same subjects: pilot study.
    Horiuchi A; Nakayama Y; Hidaka N; Ichise Y; Kajiyama M; Tanaka N
    Dig Endosc; 2009 Jan; 21(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 19691797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.