These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1292815)
1. Simplified measurement of auditory filter shapes using the notched-noise method. Stone MA; Glasberg BR; Moore BC Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec; 26(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 1292815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Glasberg BR; Moore BC Hear Res; 1990 Aug; 47(1-2):103-38. PubMed ID: 2228789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid measurement of auditory filter shape in mice using the auditory brainstem response and notched noise. Lina IA; Lauer AM Hear Res; 2013 Apr; 298():73-9. PubMed ID: 23347916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of auditory filter shapes obtained with notched-noise and noise-tone maskers. Moore BC; Glasberg BR; van der Heijden M; Houtsma AJ; Kohlrausch A J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1175-82. PubMed ID: 7876439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency-resolution measurements with notched noises for clinical purposes. Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA Ear Hear; 1994 Jun; 15(3):240-55. PubMed ID: 8076722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners. Sommers MS; Humes LE J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Auditory filter nonlinearity at 2 kHz in normal hearing listeners. Rosen S; Baker RJ; Darling A J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2539-50. PubMed ID: 9604348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of auditory filter shapes derived with three different maskers. Glasberg BR; Moore BC; Nimmo-Smith I J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):536-44. PubMed ID: 6699291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of Bayesian Active Learning to the Estimation of Auditory Filter Shapes Using the Notched-Noise Method. Schlittenlacher J; Turner RE; Moore BCJ Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520952992. PubMed ID: 33073723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory filter widths in children and adults. Soderquist DR J Exp Child Psychol; 1993 Dec; 56(3):371-84. PubMed ID: 8301244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The temporal course of masking and the auditory filter shape. Moore BC; Poon PW; Bacon SP; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jun; 81(6):1873-80. PubMed ID: 3611508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. Moore BC; Glasberg BR J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Oct; 70(4):1003-14. PubMed ID: 7288037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Auditory filter shapes for the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the white whale (Delphinapterus leucas) derived with notched noise. Finneran JJ; Schlundt CE; Carder DA; Ridgway SH J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):322-8. PubMed ID: 12141358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Auditory filter shapes in the chinchilla. Halpern DL; Dallos P J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Sep; 80(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 3760330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of signal delay on auditory filter shapes derived from psychophysical tuning curves and notched-noise data obtained in simultaneous masking. Bacon SP; Repovsch-Duffey JL; Liu L J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jul; 112(1):227-37. PubMed ID: 12141348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]