BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

424 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12928469)

  • 1. Association of funding and conclusions in randomized drug trials: a reflection of treatment effect or adverse events?
    Als-Nielsen B; Chen W; Gluud C; Kjaergard LL
    JAMA; 2003 Aug; 290(7):921-8. PubMed ID: 12928469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association of funding source on effect size in randomized controlled trials: 2013-2015 - a cross-sectional survey and meta-analysis.
    Falk Delgado A; Falk Delgado A
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):125. PubMed ID: 28292317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Financial conflicts of interest and their association with outcome and quality of fibromyalgia drug therapy randomized controlled trials.
    Pang WK; Yeter KC; Torralba KD; Spencer HJ; Khan NA
    Int J Rheum Dis; 2015 Jul; 18(6):606-15. PubMed ID: 26012523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Funding source, trial outcome and reporting quality: are they related? Results of a pilot study.
    Clifford TJ; Barrowman NJ; Moher D
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2002 Sep; 2(1):18. PubMed ID: 12213183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reported outcomes in major cardiovascular clinical trials funded by for-profit and not-for-profit organizations: 2000-2005.
    Ridker PM; Torres J
    JAMA; 2006 May; 295(19):2270-4. PubMed ID: 16705108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Are treatment effects or adverse effects of significance for the association between financing and conclusions in randomized trials?].
    Als-Nielsen BE; Chen W; Gluud CN; Gluud LL
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 Apr; 166(18):1676-8. PubMed ID: 15174406
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Industry-supported meta-analyses compared with meta-analyses with non-profit or no support: differences in methodological quality and conclusions.
    Jørgensen AW; Maric KL; Tendal B; Faurschou A; Gøtzsche PC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2008 Sep; 8():60. PubMed ID: 18782430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: why some statins appear more efficacious than others.
    Bero L; Oostvogel F; Bacchetti P; Lee K
    PLoS Med; 2007 Jun; 4(6):e184. PubMed ID: 17550302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Association of industry funding with the outcome and quality of randomized controlled trials of drug therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.
    Khan NA; Lombeida JI; Singh M; Spencer HJ; Torralba KD
    Arthritis Rheum; 2012 Jul; 64(7):2059-67. PubMed ID: 22275179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differential citation rates of major cardiovascular clinical trials according to source of funding: a survey from 2000 to 2005.
    Conen D; Torres J; Ridker PM
    Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(13):1321-7. PubMed ID: 18779441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Funding, disease area, and internal validity of hepatobiliary randomized clinical trials.
    Kjaergard LL; Gluud C
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Nov; 97(11):2708-13. PubMed ID: 12425537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.
    Bhandari M; Busse JW; Jackowski D; Montori VM; Schünemann H; Sprague S; Mears D; Schemitsch EH; Heels-Ansdell D; Devereaux PJ
    CMAJ; 2004 Feb; 170(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 14970094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials.
    Yaphe J; Edman R; Knishkowy B; Herman J
    Fam Pract; 2001 Dec; 18(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 11739337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
    Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
    Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research.
    Djulbegovic B; Lacevic M; Cantor A; Fields KK; Bennett CL; Adams JR; Kuderer NM; Lyman GH
    Lancet; 2000 Aug; 356(9230):635-8. PubMed ID: 10968436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome reporting among drug trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
    Bourgeois FT; Murthy S; Mandl KD
    Ann Intern Med; 2010 Aug; 153(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 20679560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
    Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
    Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting of conflicts of interest in meta-analyses of trials of pharmacological treatments.
    Roseman M; Milette K; Bero LA; Coyne JC; Lexchin J; Turner EH; Thombs BD
    JAMA; 2011 Mar; 305(10):1008-17. PubMed ID: 21386079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Self-declared stock ownership and association with positive trial outcome in randomized controlled trials with binary outcomes published in general medical journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Falk Delgado A; Falk Delgado A
    Trials; 2017 Jul; 18(1):354. PubMed ID: 28747226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A meta-epidemiological study to examine the association between bias and treatment effects in neonatal trials.
    Bialy L; Vandermeer B; Lacaze-Masmonteil T; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    Evid Based Child Health; 2014 Dec; 9(4):1052-9. PubMed ID: 25504975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.