254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12928690)
1. Evaluating a new logMAR chart designed to improve visual acuity assessment in population-based surveys.
Bourne RR; Rosser DA; Sukudom P; Dineen B; Laidlaw DA; Johnson GJ; Murdoch IE
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 12928690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving on ETDRS acuities: design and results for a computerised thresholding device.
Rosser DA; Murdoch IE; Fitzke FW; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2003 Aug; 17(6):701-6. PubMed ID: 12928680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a computerised logMAR visual acuity measurement system (COMPlog): comparison with ETDRS and the electronic ETDRS testing algorithm in adults and amblyopic children.
Laidlaw DA; Tailor V; Shah N; Atamian S; Harcourt C
Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 92(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 17993577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construction and validation of a Tamil logMAR chart.
Varadharajan S; Srinivasan K; Kumaresan B
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2009 Sep; 29(5):526-534. PubMed ID: 19689549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A customised portable LogMAR chart with adjustable chart illumination for use as a mass screening device in the rural population.
Gouthaman M; Raman RP; Kadambi A; Padmajakumari R; Paul PG; Sharma T
J Postgrad Med; 2005; 51(2):112-4, discussion 115. PubMed ID: 16006702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Repeatability and reliability of the visual acuity examination on logMAR ETDRS and Snellen chart].
Veselý P; Synek S
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2012 May; 68(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 22913870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of letter separation on computerised visual acuity measurements: comparison with the gold standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Brown G; Robson C
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Mar; 30(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 20444125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of a Smartphone-Based Visual Acuity Test (Peek Acuity) for Clinical Practice and Community-Based Fieldwork.
Bastawrous A; Rono HK; Livingstone IA; Weiss HA; Jordan S; Kuper H; Burton MJ
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 133(8):930-7. PubMed ID: 26022921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of visual acuity assessment in normal and low visual acuity.
Becker R; Teichler G; Gräf M
Strabismus; 2007; 15(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 17523039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the amblyopia treatment study HOTV and electronic-early treatment of diabetic retinopathy study visual acuity protocols in children aged 5 to 12 years.
Rice ML; Leske DA; Holmes JM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 14962417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Thai logarithmic visual acuity chart.
Ruamviboonsuk P; Tiensuwan M
J Med Assoc Thai; 2002 Jun; 85(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 12322840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of a "reduced logMAR" visual acuity chart for use in routine clinical practice.
Rosser DA; Laidlaw DA; Murdoch IE
Br J Ophthalmol; 2001 Apr; 85(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 11264133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a computerised visual acuity measurement device in subjects with age-related macular degeneration: comparison with gold standard ETDRS chart measurements.
Bokinni Y; Shah N; Maguire O; Laidlaw DA
Eye (Lond); 2015 Aug; 29(8):1085-91. PubMed ID: 26043703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized repeating and averaging improve the test-retest variability of ETDRS visual acuity measurements: implications for sensitivity and specificity.
Shah N; Laidlaw DA; Shah SP; Sivasubramaniam S; Bunce C; Cousens S
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Dec; 52(13):9397-402. PubMed ID: 22003109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modified ETDRS visual acuity chart for European-wide use.
Plainis S; Tzatzala P; Orphanos Y; Tsilimbaris MK
Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):647-53. PubMed ID: 17632314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of scoring and termination rules on test-retest variability of a novel high-pass letter acuity chart.
Shah N; Dakin SC; Whitaker HL; Anderson RS
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 55(3):1386-92. PubMed ID: 24519424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New visual acuity chart: modification for clinical practice and research.
Pisarnkorskul P; Singhkuna L
J Med Assoc Thai; 2003 Mar; 86(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 12757065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing LEA numbers low vision book and Feinbloom visual acuity charts.
Hardgrave N; Hatley J; Lewerenz D
Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Nov; 89(11):1611-8. PubMed ID: 23026789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A portable visual acuity device used in diabetic retinal screening.
Kehler LF; Kehler KB; Merin LM; Tsai JC
Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 143(3):514-5. PubMed ID: 17317400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
