191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12928960)
1. Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Hentsch A; Aschauer MA; Balzer JO; Brossmann J; Busch HP; Davis K; Douek P; Ebner F; van Engelshoven JM; Gregor M; Kersting C; Knüsel PR; Leen E; Leiner T; Loewe C; McPherson S; Reimer P; Schäfer FK; Taupitz M; Thurnher SA; Tombach B; Wegener R; Weishaupt D; Meaney JF
Eur Radiol; 2003 Sep; 13(9):2103-14. PubMed ID: 12928960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Routine use of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-table MR angiography in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
Deutschmann HA; Schoellnast H; Portugaller HR; Preidler KW; Reittner P; Tillich M; Pilger E; Szolar DH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2006; 29(5):762-70. PubMed ID: 16625410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MR Angiography at 3 T of Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Gadoterate Meglumine and Gadobutrol.
Loewe C; Arnaiz J; Krause D; Marti-Bonmati L; Haneder S; Kramer U;
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1311-21. PubMed ID: 26001243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [First clinical results in a study of contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with the 1.0 molar gadobutrol in peripheral arterial occlusive disease--comparison to intraarterial DSA].
Schäfer FK; Schäfer PJ; Jahnke T; Walluscheck K; Priebe M; Hentsch A; Heller M; Brossmann J
Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 12677513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diagnostic performance of gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large-scale multicenter trial.
Thurnher S; Miller S; Schneider G; Ballarati C; Bongartz G; Herborn CU; Schoenberg S; Cova MA; Morana G; Niazi K; Iezzi R; Taupitz M; Bluemke DA; Kreitner KF; Kirchin MA; Pirovano G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Nov; 189(5):1223-37. PubMed ID: 17954665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility of peripheral contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 Tesla with a hybrid technique: comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Berg F; Bangard C; Bovenschulte H; Hellmich M; Nijenhuis M; Lackner K; Gossmann A
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 18708858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of contrast-enhanced multi-station MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity arterial disease.
Burbelko M; Augsten M; Kalinowski MO; Heverhagen JT
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Jun; 37(6):1427-35. PubMed ID: 23188773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in occlusive disease of the pelvic and lower limb arteries: results of a prospective intraindividual comparative study with digital subtraction angiography in 76 patients.
Winterer JT; Laubenberger J; Scheffler K; Neumann K; Bayraktarli YR; Allmann KH; Uhrmeister P; Langer M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1999; 23(4):583-9. PubMed ID: 10433291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ECG-triggered non-enhanced MR angiography of peripheral arteries in comparison to DSA in patients with peripheral artery occlusive disease.
Partovi S; Rasmus M; Schulte AC; Rengier F; Jacob AL; Aschwanden M; Karmonik C; Bongartz G; Bilecen D
MAGMA; 2013 Jun; 26(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 23117342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast material-enhanced, moving-table MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for surveillance of peripheral arterial bypass grafts.
Loewe C; Cejna M; Schoder M; Loewe-Grgurin M; Wolf F; Lammer J; Thurnher SA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Sep; 14(9 Pt 1):1129-37. PubMed ID: 14514804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic pitfalls in postinterventional intraarterial magnetic resonance angiography after recanalization of femoropopliteal arterial occlusions.
Huegli RW; Aschwanden M; Kos S; Rasmus M; Jaeger K; Jacob AL; Bilecen D
Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec; 49(10):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19031180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripheral magnetic resonance angiography with continuous table movement in combination with high spatial and temporal resolution time-resolved MRA With a total single dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of gadobutrol at 3.0 T.
Voth M; Haneder S; Huck K; Gutfleisch A; Schönberg SO; Michaely HJ
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):627-33. PubMed ID: 19652610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peripheral run-off CE-MRA with a 1.0 molar gadolinium chelate (Gadovist) with intraarterial DSA comparison.
Gregor M; Tombach B; Hentsch A; Reimer P
Acad Radiol; 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2():S398-400. PubMed ID: 12188288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. MR angiography of the pedal arteries with gadobenate dimeglumine, a contrast agent with increased relaxivity, and comparison with selective intraarterial DSA.
Kreitner KF; Kunz RP; Herber S; Martenstein S; Dorweiler B; Dueber C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jan; 27(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 18058929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
