193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12929058)
1. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a conventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Mulcahy HE; Riches A; Kiely M; Farthing MJ; Fairclough PD
Endoscopy; 2001 Apr; 33(4):311-6. PubMed ID: 11315891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Unsedated peroral endoscopy with a video ultrathin endoscope: patient acceptance, tolerance, and diagnostic accuracy.
Zaman A; Hapke R; Sahagun G; Katon RM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1998 Aug; 93(8):1260-3. PubMed ID: 9707048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of combined meperidine and midazolam for EGD sedation compared with midazolam alone.
Diab FH; King PD; Barthel JS; Marshall JB
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Jun; 91(6):1120-5. PubMed ID: 8651156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance.
Campo R; Montserrat A; Brullet E
Endoscopy; 1998 Jun; 30(5):448-52. PubMed ID: 9693891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.
Dumortier J; Napoleon B; Hedelius F; Pellissier PE; Leprince E; Pujol B; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 12556784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.
Zaman A; Hahn M; Hapke R; Knigge K; Fennerty MB; Katon RM
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):279-84. PubMed ID: 10049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy?].
Taller A; Horváth E; Iliás L; Harsányi L
Orv Hetil; 2002 Feb; 143(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 11915188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Fisher NC; Bailey S; Gibson JA
Endoscopy; 1998 Jan; 30(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 9548039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: a new technique for accurately detecting and grading esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Saeian K; Staff D; Knox J; Binion D; Townsend W; Dua K; Shaker R
Am J Gastroenterol; 2002 Sep; 97(9):2246-9. PubMed ID: 12358240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparation, premedication and surveillance.
Lazzaroni M; Bianchi Porro G
Endoscopy; 2003 Feb; 35(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 12561003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy.
Shaker R; Saeian K
Am J Med; 2001 Dec; 111 Suppl 8A():153S-156S. PubMed ID: 11749942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY; Moulinier B; Zarka F; Paliard P; Lambert R
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):285-91. PubMed ID: 10049409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A preliminary study of patients' concerns related to GI endoscopy.
Drossman DA; Brandt LJ; Sears C; Li Z; Nat J; Bozymski EM
Am J Gastroenterol; 1996 Feb; 91(2):287-91. PubMed ID: 8607494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy.
Faulx AL; Catanzaro A; Zyzanski S; Cooper GS; Pfau PR; Isenberg G; Wong RC; Sivak MV; Chak A
Gastrointest Endosc; 2002 May; 55(6):620-3. PubMed ID: 11979240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed by a family physician. A case series of 793 procedures.
Pierzchajlo RP; Ackermann RJ; Vogel RL
J Fam Pract; 1998 Jan; 46(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 9451369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of transnasal and transoral oesophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Bampton PA; Reid DP; Johnson RD; Fitch RJ; Dent J
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 1998 Jun; 13(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 9715399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of unsedated transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy and conventional EGD.
Dean R; Dua K; Massey B; Berger W; Hogan WJ; Shaker R
Gastrointest Endosc; 1996 Oct; 44(4):422-4. PubMed ID: 8905361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
