These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1292990)

  • 1. Factors that affect depth perception in stereoscopic displays.
    Patterson R; Moe L; Hewitt T
    Hum Factors; 1992 Dec; 34(6):655-67. PubMed ID: 1292990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The interaction of oculomotor cues and stimulus size in stereoscopic death constancy.
    Collett TS; Schwarz U; Sobel EC
    Perception; 1991; 20(6):733-54. PubMed ID: 1816533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 85(3):164-73. PubMed ID: 18317331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of artificial stereoscopic stimuli from an incorrect viewing point.
    Bereby-Meyer Y; Leiser D; Meyer J
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1555-63. PubMed ID: 10598469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceived rigidity in motion-in-depth increases with contour perspective.
    Vienne C; Blondé L; Mamassian P
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):481-98. PubMed ID: 25154283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stereoscopic depth and the occlusion illusion.
    Palmer SE; Schloss KB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1083-94. PubMed ID: 19525539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal integration differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms.
    Patterson R; Cayko R; Short GL; Flanagan R; Moe L; Taylor E; Day P
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Aug; 57(6):891-7. PubMed ID: 7651812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetrical effect of crossed and uncrossed disparity on stereoscopic capture.
    Ishigushi A; Wolfe JM
    Perception; 1993; 22(12):1403-13. PubMed ID: 8090618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human discrimination of depth of field in stereoscopic and nonstereoscopic photographs.
    Zhang T; Nefs HT; Heynderickx I
    Perception; 2014; 43(5):368-80. PubMed ID: 25109005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of 3-D digitizing in stereoscopic images.
    Inoue T; Kawai T; Noro K
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1357-63. PubMed ID: 8974886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Apparent relative size and depth of moving objects.
    Kaneko H; Uchikawa K
    Perception; 1993; 22(5):537-47. PubMed ID: 8414880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The binocular fusion of human vision on stereoscopic displays--field of view and environment effects.
    Nagata S
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1273-84. PubMed ID: 8888639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perceived depth scales with disparity gradient.
    Bülthoff H; Fahle M; Wegmann M
    Perception; 1991; 20(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 1745587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oculomotor contribution to the change in perceived speed with viewing distance.
    Geri GA; Pierce BJ; Patterson R
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Nov; 25(11):2851-7. PubMed ID: 18978866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Depth motion sensitivity functions.
    Eriksson S
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 10743386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation: effects of stimulus spatial frequency and eccentricity.
    Cisarik PM; Harwerth RS
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 May; 160(1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15836903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stereopsis loses dominance over relative size as target separation increases.
    Marlow P; Gillam BJ
    Perception; 2011; 40(12):1413-27. PubMed ID: 22474761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shifting visual attention in stereographic displays: a time course analysis.
    Iavecchia HP; Folk CL
    Hum Factors; 1994 Dec; 36(4):606-18. PubMed ID: 7875690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereoscopic perception of real depths at large distances.
    Palmisano S; Gillam B; Govan DG; Allison RS; Harris JM
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):19. PubMed ID: 20884568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Poggendorf illusion in stereoscopic space.
    Drobnis BJ; Lawson RB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 1256969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.