These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12930471)
1. How much memory does oculomotor search have? McCarley JS; Wang RF; Kramer AF; Irwin DE; Peterson MS Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 12930471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual search is guided by prospective and retrospective memory. Peterson MS; Beck MR; Vomela M Percept Psychophys; 2007 Jan; 69(1):123-35. PubMed ID: 17515222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory for the search path: evidence for a high-capacity representation of search history. Dickinson CA; Zelinsky GJ Vision Res; 2007 Jun; 47(13):1745-55. PubMed ID: 17482657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does oculomotor inhibition of return influence fixation probability during scene search? Smith TJ; Henderson JM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Nov; 73(8):2384-98. PubMed ID: 21837543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Global transsaccadic change blindness during scene perception. Henderson JM; Hollingworth A Psychol Sci; 2003 Sep; 14(5):493-7. PubMed ID: 12930482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Capture of the gaze does not capture the mind. Lange EB; Starzynski C; Engbert R Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1168-82. PubMed ID: 22648605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The interaction between memorized objects and abrupt onsets in oculomotor capture. Wong JH; Peterson MS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1768-79. PubMed ID: 21533921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Change blindness and visual memory: visual representations get rich and act poor. Varakin DA; Levin DT Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):51-77. PubMed ID: 16464287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Eye movements in active visual search: a computable phenomenological model. Keech TD; Resca L Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):285-307. PubMed ID: 20139446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic selection of irrelevant object features through working memory: evidence for top-down attentional capture. Soto D; Humphreys GW Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):165-72. PubMed ID: 19289358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Has someone moved my plate? The immediate and persistent effects of object location changes on gaze allocation during natural scene viewing. Võ ML; Zwickel J; Schneider WX Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1251-5. PubMed ID: 20601706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Scene and position specificity in visual memory for objects. Hollingworth A J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 16478340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Object-position binding in visual short-term memory for sequentially presented unfamiliar stimuli. Sapkota RP; Pardhan S; van der Linde I Perception; 2011; 40(5):538-48. PubMed ID: 21882718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Orienting attention in visual working memory reduces interference from memory probes. Makovski T; Sussman R; Jiang YV J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Mar; 34(2):369-80. PubMed ID: 18315412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What are the units of visual short-term memory, objects or spatial locations? Lee D; Chun MM Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):253-7. PubMed ID: 11281100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibitory tagging in visual search can be found if search stimuli remain visible. Takeda Y; Yagi A Percept Psychophys; 2000 Jul; 62(5):927-34. PubMed ID: 10997039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]