These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12930653)

  • 1. [Two-dimensional finite element stress analysis of simulating restored teeth with wedge-shaped defects under loads].
    Zhang Q; Wang JD; Huo B
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Jul; 38(4):264-5. PubMed ID: 12930653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transient thermal and stress analysis of maxillary second premolar tooth using an exact three-dimensional model.
    Hashemipour MA; Mohammadpour A; Nassab SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(2):158-64. PubMed ID: 20657080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Restoration of cervical wedge-shaped defect of teeth using sandwich technique of light cure composite and glass ionomer cement].
    Xia SL
    Hunan Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2000 Jun; 25(3):313-4. PubMed ID: 12212185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical and microbiological effects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations.
    Paolantonio M; D'ercole S; Perinetti G; Tripodi D; Catamo G; Serra E; Bruè C; Piccolomini R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):200-7. PubMed ID: 15016024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part II. Restorative material selection to minimise fracture.
    Ichim IP; Schmidlin PR; Li Q; Kieser JA; Swain MV
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1562-9. PubMed ID: 17391747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stress distributions in adhesively cemented ceramic and resin-composite Class II inlay restorations: a 3D-FEA study.
    Ausiello P; Rengo S; Davidson CL; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):862-72. PubMed ID: 15451242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical effects of cervical lesions and restoration on periodontally compromised teeth.
    Kuroe T; Caputo AA; Ohata N; Itoh H
    Quintessence Int; 2001 Feb; 32(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 12066671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A clinical evaluation of two new materials for restoration of dental wedge-shaped defects].
    Li P; Wang J; Li J
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 11831966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Finite element analysis of stresses in endodontically treated, dowel-restored teeth.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 16198168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pulpal response to a newly developed MMA based resin cement for bonding tooth-colored indirect restorations.
    Seki Y; Shimada Y; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):297-302. PubMed ID: 17076029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Effects of dental cements on the stress distribution in amalgam-restored teeth].
    Zhao SL; Zhang SF; Li Y; Liu H; Wang MQ
    Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao; 2003 May; 23(5):474-6. PubMed ID: 12754135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
    Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mechanical evaluation of cervical glass-ionomer restorations: 3D finite element study.
    Ichim I; Schmidlin PR; Kieser JA; Swain MV
    J Dent; 2007 Jan; 35(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 16782259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of cervical lesion on the stress state and strength of tooth with occlusal restoration: a numerical model study.
    Kierklo A; Tribiłło R; Walendziuk A; Stokowska W
    Rocz Akad Med Bialymst; 2002; 47():95-104. PubMed ID: 12533951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
    van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Restoration of non-carious cervical lesions Part I. Modelling of restorative fracture.
    Ichim I; Li Q; Loughran J; Swain MV; Kieser J
    Dent Mater; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1553-61. PubMed ID: 17391749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.