These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12930762)

  • 21. Response to selection while maximizing genetic variance in small populations.
    Cervantes I; Gutiérrez JP; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Sep; 48(1):69. PubMed ID: 27649906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of sire mating patterns on future genetic merit and inbreeding in a closed beef cattle population.
    Oyama K; Nojima M; Shojo M; Fukushima M; Anada K; Mukai F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 17488357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A general procedure for predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2000 Apr; 154(4):1865-77. PubMed ID: 10747075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2000; 32(3):231-48. PubMed ID: 14736390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing selection.
    Woolliams JA; Bijma P
    Genetics; 2000 Apr; 154(4):1851-64. PubMed ID: 10747074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Genetic management of Dutch golden retriever dogs with a simulation tool.
    Windig JJ; Oldenbroek K
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Dec; 132(6):428-40. PubMed ID: 25912813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Genetic response and inbreeding with different selection methods and mating designs for nucleus breeding programs of dairy cattle.
    Leitch HW; Smith C; Burnside EB; Quinton M
    J Dairy Sci; 1994 Jun; 77(6):1702-18. PubMed ID: 8083430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.
    Makanjuola BO; Miglior F; Abdalla EA; Maltecca C; Schenkel FS; Baes CF
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jun; 103(6):5183-5199. PubMed ID: 32278553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mating structures for genomic selection breeding programs in aquaculture.
    Sonesson AK; Ødegård J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):46. PubMed ID: 27342705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improving the estimation of realized effective population sizes in farm animals.
    Gutiérrez JP; Cervantes I; Goyache F
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Aug; 126(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19630884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A simulation study of a honeybee breeding scheme accounting for polyandry, direct and maternal effects on colony performance.
    Kistler T; Basso B; Phocas F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2021 Sep; 53(1):71. PubMed ID: 34496761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Variance components and breeding values for growth traits from different statistical models.
    Ferreira GB; MacNeil MD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Oct; 77(10):2641-50. PubMed ID: 10521023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep.
    Avendaño S; Villanueva B; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2964-75. PubMed ID: 14677851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A fast algorithm for computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations.
    Sargolzaei M; Iwaisaki H; Colleau JJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2005 Oct; 122(5):325-31. PubMed ID: 16191041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of non-random mating on genomic and BLUP selection schemes.
    Nirea KG; Sonesson AK; Woolliams JA; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Apr; 44(1):11. PubMed ID: 22494646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduction of inbreeding in commercial females by rotational mating with several sire lines.
    Honda T; Nomura T; Mukai F
    Genet Sel Evol; 2004; 36(5):509-26. PubMed ID: 15339630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reducing inbreeding rates with a breeding circle: Theory and practice in Veluws Heideschaap.
    Windig JJ; Verweij MJW; Oldenbroek JK
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jan; 136(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 30548349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sustainable long-term conservation of rare cattle breeds using rotational AI sires.
    Colleau JJ; Avon L
    Genet Sel Evol; 2008; 40(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 18558074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A genetic interpretation of the variation in inbreeding depression.
    Moorad JA; Wade MJ
    Genetics; 2005 Jul; 170(3):1373-84. PubMed ID: 15911591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.