These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12931053)

  • 1. A simple nonparametric test for linkage with sib-pair censored event time observations.
    Wei E; Wei LJ; Xu X
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 12931053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonparametric trend statistic incorporating dispersion differences in sib pair linkage for quantitative traits.
    Kim MK; Hong YJ; Song HH
    Hum Hered; 2006; 62(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 16954696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. X-linked extension of the revised Haseman-Elston algorithm for linkage analysis in sib pairs.
    Wiener H; Elston RC; Tiwari HK
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):97-107. PubMed ID: 12931048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Weighting improves the "new Haseman-Elston" method.
    Forrest WF
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 11359067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias toward the null hypothesis in model-free linkage analysis is highly dependent on the test statistic used.
    Cordell HJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2004 Jun; 74(6):1294-302. PubMed ID: 15124101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rank transformation in Haseman-Elston regression using scores for location-scale alternatives.
    Gerhard D; Hothorn LA
    Hum Hered; 2010; 69(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 20029226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Adding further power to the Haseman and Elston method for detecting linkage in larger sibships: weighting sums and differences.
    Shete S; Jacobs KB; Elston RC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):79-85. PubMed ID: 12931046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Score test for age at onset genetic linkage analysis in selected sibling pairs.
    Callegaro A; van Houwelingen HC; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Jun; 28(14):1913-26. PubMed ID: 19402027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regression-based sib pair linkage analysis for binary traits.
    Zeegers MP; Rice JP; Rijsdijk FV; Abecasis GR; Sham PC
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):125-31. PubMed ID: 12931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of smoothing techniques in the interpretation of results from genomic scans using sib-pair data.
    Siegmund KD; Todorov AA; Rao DC; Borecki IB
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):1047-52. PubMed ID: 9433622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Environmental covariates: effects on the power of sib-pair linkage methods.
    Mandal DM; Sorant AJ; Pugh EW; Marcus SE; Klein AP; Mathias RA; O'Neill J; Temiyakarn LF; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S643-8. PubMed ID: 10597507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A score test for the linkage analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits based on identity by descent data from sib-pairs.
    Dudoit S; Speed TP
    Biostatistics; 2000 Mar; 1(1):1-26. PubMed ID: 12933522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gain in efficiency from using generalized least squares in the Haseman-Elston test.
    Single RM; Finch SJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 8788027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The power of two-locus affected sib-pair linkage analysis to detect interacting disease loci.
    Hallgrímsdóttir IB; Speed TP
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 32(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 17654608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Haseman and Elston revisited.
    Elston RC; Buxbaum S; Jacobs KB; Olson JM
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 10861893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Maximum-Likelihood-Binomial method for genetic model-free linkage analysis of quantitative traits in sibships.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17(2):102-17. PubMed ID: 10414555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust methods for the detection of genetic linkage for quantitative data from pedigrees.
    Amos CI; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1989; 6(2):349-60. PubMed ID: 2721929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of misspecification of allele frequencies on the power of Haseman-Elston sib-pair linkage method for quantitative traits.
    Mandal DM; Wilson AF; Bailey-Wilson JE
    Am J Med Genet; 2001 Nov; 103(4):308-13. PubMed ID: 11746011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Allele-sharing statistics using information on family history.
    Callegaro A; Meulenbelt I; Kloppenburg M; Slagboom PE; Houwing-Duistermaat JJ
    Ann Hum Genet; 2010 Nov; 74(6):547-54. PubMed ID: 20707788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of uninformative families in mean allele sharing tests for linkage.
    Mukhopadhyay I; Feingold E; Wang T; Elston RC; Weeks DE
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article13. PubMed ID: 17049024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.