These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12931159)
1. Who said 'helix'? Fuller W Nature; 2003 Aug; 424(6951):876-8. PubMed ID: 12931159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The discovery of the DNA double helix. Klug A J Mol Biol; 2004 Jan; 335(1):3-26. PubMed ID: 14659736 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Historical article: DNA polymorphism and the early history of the double helix. Arnott S Trends Biochem Sci; 2006 Jun; 31(6):349-54. PubMed ID: 16678428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The double helix: a tale of two puckers. Rich A Nat Struct Biol; 2003 Apr; 10(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 12660721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The scientist who saw what we're made of. Sobel RK US News World Rep; 2001 Jul 9-16; 131(2):59. PubMed ID: 11447846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Watson JD; Crick FH Am J Psychiatry; 2003 Apr; 160(4):623-4. PubMed ID: 12668347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rosalind Franklin Papers at the National Library of Medicine. Watermark (Arch Libr Hist Health Sci); 2007; 30(3):72-3. PubMed ID: 19425260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rosalind Franklin was so much more than the 'wronged heroine' of DNA. Nature; 2020 Jul; 583(7817):492. PubMed ID: 32694848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The DNA revolution. A twist of fate. Lemonick MD Time; 2003 Feb; 161(7):48-51, 53-8. PubMed ID: 12602129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Old school ties: Watson, Crick, and 40 years of DNA. Hall SS Science; 1993 Mar; 259(5101):1532-3. PubMed ID: 8456281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perceptions in science. The making of an icon. de Chadarevian S Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5617):255-7. PubMed ID: 12690175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. DNA discoveries through crystallography. Subirana JA Nature; 2003 Jun; 423(6941):683. PubMed ID: 12802307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Was Watson and Crick's model truly self-evident? Scher S Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6975):584. PubMed ID: 14961092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. William Astbury and the biological significance of nucleic acids, 1938-1951. Hall K Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2011 Jun; 42(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 21486649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "The greatest surprise for everyone"--notes on the 50th anniversary of the double helix. Judson HF N Engl J Med; 2003 Apr; 348(17):1712-4. PubMed ID: 12711749 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 50 years of the double helix. Sanders FN S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):324. PubMed ID: 12830589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. 1953. Watson JD; Crick FH Rev Invest Clin; 2003; 55(2):108-9. PubMed ID: 12911027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. April 25, 1953: three papers, three lessons. Tobin MJ Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2003 Apr; 167(8):1047-9. PubMed ID: 12684243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The double helix: 50 years and always with it! A small step for a helix, a giant step for science]. Jeanteur P Bull Cancer; 2003 Apr; 90(4):297-8. PubMed ID: 12801810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]