These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12931924)

  • 1. Effect on survey return rates of having a signed or unsigned postcard as the third-wave mailing.
    Price JH; Dake JA; Akpanudo S; Kleinfelder J
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):1099-102. PubMed ID: 12931924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tone of postcards in increasing survey response rates.
    Price JH; Yingling F; Walsh E; Murnan J; Dake JA
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Apr; 94(2):444-8. PubMed ID: 15154170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias.
    Asch DA
    Epidemiology; 1996 Sep; 7(5):550-1. PubMed ID: 8862992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of two distribution methods on response rates to a patient safety questionnaire in nursing homes.
    Lapane KL; Quilliam BJ; Hughes CM
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2007 Sep; 8(7):446-52. PubMed ID: 17845947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introductory postcards: do they increase response rate in a telephone survey of older persons?
    Iredell H; Shaw T; Howat P; James R; Granich J
    Health Educ Res; 2004 Apr; 19(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 15031275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recruitment of young adults for weight gain prevention: randomized comparison of direct mail strategies.
    Crane MM; LaRose JG; Espeland MA; Wing RR; Tate DF
    Trials; 2016 Jun; 17(1):282. PubMed ID: 27278474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey response inducements for registered nurses.
    Hill CA; Fahrney K; Wheeless SC; Carson CP
    West J Nurs Res; 2006 Apr; 28(3):322-34. PubMed ID: 16585808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Increasing response to mailed questionnaires by including a pencil/pen.
    White E; Carney PA; Kolar AS
    Am J Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 162(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 15972931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mailed survey follow-ups--are postcard reminders more cost-effective than second questionnaires?
    Becker H; Cookston J; Kulberg V
    West J Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 22(5):642-7. PubMed ID: 10943176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survey return rates for multiple-authored versus single-authored covering letters.
    Price JH; Khubchandani J; Bryant M; Rickard M; Hendershot C; Thompson A
    Psychol Rep; 2010 Aug; 107(1):209-12. PubMed ID: 20923065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey.
    Roberts H; Pearson JC; Dengler R
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1993 Aug; 47(4):334-5. PubMed ID: 8228774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing response rates for mailed surveys of Medicaid clients and other low-income populations.
    Gibson PJ; Koepsell TD; Diehr P; Hale C
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 149(11):1057-62. PubMed ID: 10355382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Del Valle ML; Morgenstern H; Rogstad TL; Albright C; Vickrey BG
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Dec; 20(4):389-406. PubMed ID: 10183331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Three Postal Invitational Strategies to Increase Survey Response Rates in a Combat-Injured U.S. Military Population: Findings From the Wounded Warrior Recovery Project.
    Sack DI; Woodruff SI; McCabe CT; Galarneau MR; Han PP
    Mil Med; 2019 Mar; 184(Suppl 1):521-528. PubMed ID: 30901447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Total Design Method in a survey of Japanese dentists.
    Nakai Y; Milgrom P; Yoshida T; Ishihara C; Shimono T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2005 Aug; 5():27. PubMed ID: 16115323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of a monetary incentive in increasing the return rate of a survey to family physicians.
    Everett SA; Price JH; Bedell AW; Telljohann SK
    Eval Health Prof; 1997 Jun; 20(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 10183321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Questionnaire color and response rates to mailed surveys. A randomized trial and a meta-analysis.
    Etter JF; Cucherat M; Perneger TV
    Eval Health Prof; 2002 Jun; 25(2):185-99. PubMed ID: 12026752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prenotification had no additional effect on the response rate and survey quality: a randomized trial.
    Xie Y; Ho SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 66(12):1422-6. PubMed ID: 23742789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to mail surveys: effect of a request to explain refusal to participate. The ARIC Study Investigators.
    Shahar E; Bisgard KM; Folsom AR
    Epidemiology; 1993 Sep; 4(5):480-2. PubMed ID: 8399698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.