These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12932677)
1. Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions. Demirkazik FB; Gülsün M; Firat P Clin Imaging; 2003; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 12932677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Franquet T; De Miguel C; Cozcolluela R; Donoso L Radiographics; 1993 Jul; 13(4):841-52. PubMed ID: 8356272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions]. Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Role of US-guided fine-needle aspiration with on-site cytopathologic evaluation in management of nonpalpable breast lesions. Buchbinder SS; Gurell DS; Tarlow MM; Salvatore M; Suhrland MJ; Kader K Acad Radiol; 2001 Apr; 8(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 11293780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [99mTc-MIBI characterization of breast microcalcifications. Correlations with scintigraphic and histopathologic findings]. Vanoli C; Antronaco R; Giovanella L; Ceriani L; Sessa F; Fugazzola C Radiol Med; 1999; 98(1-2):19-25. PubMed ID: 10566292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 201Tl scintigraphy in the evaluation of palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions: correlation with mammography and ultrasonography. Vural G; Atasever T; Ozdemir A; Oznur I; Karabacak NI; Gökçora N; Işik S; Unlü M Nuklearmedizin; 1997 Dec; 36(8):282-8. PubMed ID: 17068879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms. Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Stereotactic core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: initial experience with a promising technique. Seoudi H; Mortier J; Basile R; Curletti E Arch Surg; 1998 Apr; 133(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 9565115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonpalpable breast lesions at biopsy. A detailed analysis of radiographic features. Skinner MA; Swain M; Simmons R; McCarty KS; Sullivan DC; Iglehart JD Ann Surg; 1988 Aug; 208(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 3401063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques. Gisvold JJ; Goellner JR; Grant CS; Donohue JH; Sykes MW; Karsell PR; Coffey SL; Jung SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 8140997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast biopsy for calcifications in nonpalpable breast lesions. A prospective study. Franceschi D; Crowe J; Zollinger R; Duchesneau R; Shenk R; Stefanek G; Shuck JM Arch Surg; 1990 Feb; 125(2):170-3. PubMed ID: 2154171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Complex sclerosing lesion: the lesion is complex, the management is straightforward. Ung OA; Lee WB; Greenberg ML; Bilous M ANZ J Surg; 2001 Jan; 71(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 11167596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions? Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solid nonpalpable breast lesions. Success and failure of guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in a consecutive series of 2444 cases. Ciatto S; Rosselli Del Turco M; Ambrogetti D; Bravetti P; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Cariaggi MP Acta Radiol; 1997 Sep; 38(5):815-20. PubMed ID: 9332236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]