These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. [Radical perineal prostatectomy--surgical technique, first results]. Mshvildadze ShT; Udzhmadzhuridze AN; Managadze GL; Shtakl' V Georgian Med News; 2007 Feb; (143):58-63. PubMed ID: 17404442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. Prasad SM; Gu X; Lavelle R; Lipsitz SR; Hu JC J Urol; 2011 Jan; 185(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 21074198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patterns of care for radical prostatectomy in the United States from 2003 to 2005. Hu JC; Hevelone ND; Ferreira MD; Lipsitz SR; Choueiri TK; Sanda MG; Earle CC J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):1969-74. PubMed ID: 18801512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Erectile Function and Oncologic Outcomes Following Open Retropubic and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the LAParoscopic Prostatectomy Robot Open Trial. Sooriakumaran P; Pini G; Nyberg T; Derogar M; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Steineck G; Wiklund PN Eur Urol; 2018 Apr; 73(4):618-627. PubMed ID: 28882327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term oncological and continence outcomes after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single-centre experience. Busch J; Stephan C; Herold A; Erber B; Kempkensteffen C; Hinz S; Lein M; Weikert S; Miller K; Magheli A BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt C):E985-90. PubMed ID: 22672442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical perineal prostatectomy: An outdated procedure? Comploj E; Palermo S; Trenti E; Martini T; Lodde M; Mian C; Mazzoleni G; Pycha A Int J Surg; 2011; 9(5):400-3. PubMed ID: 21443972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach. Harris MJ; Thompson IM Urology; 1996 Nov; 48(5):762-8. PubMed ID: 8911522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient-reported impotence and incontinence after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Talcott JA; Rieker P; Propert KJ; Clark JA; Wishnow KI; Loughlin KR; Richie JP; Kantoff PW J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Aug; 89(15):1117-23. PubMed ID: 9262249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of nerve sparing technique on patient self-assessed outcomes after radical perineal prostatectomy. Kübler HR; Tseng TY; Sun L; Vieweg J; Harris MJ; Dahm P J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):488-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17561133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: the perineal approach increases the risk of surgically induced positive margins and capsular incisions. Boccon-Gibod L; Ravery V; Vordos D; Toublanc M; Delmas V; Boccon-Gibod L J Urol; 1998 Oct; 160(4):1383-5. PubMed ID: 9751359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy gives favourable surgical and functional outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate. Palisaar JR; Wenske S; Sommerer F; Hinkel A; Noldus J BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 19298408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early prostate-specific antigen failure following radical perineal versus retropubic prostatectomy: the importance of seminal vesicle excision. Theodorescu D; Lippert MC; Broder SR; Boyd JC Urology; 1998 Feb; 51(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 9495711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Open radical retropubic prostatectomy using high anterior release of the levator fascia and constant haptic feedback in bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation plus early postoperative phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition: a contemporary series. Hubanks JM; Umbreit EC; Karnes RJ; Myers RP Eur Urol; 2012 May; 61(5):878-84. PubMed ID: 22154730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of outcomes between pure laparoscopic vs robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a study of comparative effectiveness based upon validated quality of life outcomes. Willis DL; Gonzalgo ML; Brotzman M; Feng Z; Trock B; Su LM BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(6):898-905. PubMed ID: 21933328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients. Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction After Robotic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective, Controlled, Nonrandomised Trial. Haglind E; Carlsson S; Stranne J; Wallerstedt A; Wilderäng U; Thorsteinsdottir T; Lagerkvist M; Damber JE; Bjartell A; Hugosson J; Wiklund P; Steineck G; Eur Urol; 2015 Aug; 68(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 25770484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Functional and oncological outcome of salvage prostatectomy of locally recurrent prostate cancer following radiation therapy]. Heidenreich A; Ohlmann C; Ozgür E; Engelmann U Urologe A; 2006 Apr; 45(4):474-81. PubMed ID: 16465521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]