These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12932940)

  • 1. Re: Graefen M, Augustin H, Karakiewicz PI, Hammerer PG, Haese A, Palisaar J, et al. Can predictive models for prostate cancer patients derived in the United States of America be utilized in European patients? A validation study of the Partin tables. Eur Urol 2003;43(1):6-11.
    Borque A
    Eur Urol; 2003 Sep; 44(3):377. PubMed ID: 12932940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can predictive models for prostate cancer patients derived in the United States of America be utilized in European patients? A validation study of the Partin tables.
    Graefen M; Augustin H; Karakiewicz PI; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Blonski J; Fernandez S; Erbersdobler A; Huland H
    Eur Urol; 2003 Jan; 43(1):6-10; discussion 11. PubMed ID: 12507538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Re: Felix K.-H. Chun, Markus Graefen, Alberto Briganti, Andrea Gallina, Julia Hopp, Michael W. Kattan, Hartwig Huland and Pierre I. Karakiewicz. Initial biopsy outcome prediction--head-to-head comparison of a logistic regression-based nomogram versus artificial neural network. Eur Urol 2007;51:1236-43.
    Stephan C; Meyer HA; Cammann H; Lein M; Loening SA; Jung K
    Eur Urol; 2007 May; 51(5):1446-7; author reply 1448. PubMed ID: 17141943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. External validation of the 2007 and 2001 Partin tables in Irish prostate cancer patients.
    Fanning DM; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
    Urol Int; 2010; 84(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 20215821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
    Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of accuracy between the Partin tables of 1997 and 2001 to predict final pathological stage in clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Augustin H; Eggert T; Wenske S; Karakiewicz PI; Palisaar J; Daghofer F; Huland H; Graefen M
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):177-81. PubMed ID: 14665871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of Partin tables for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Blute ML; Bergstralh EJ; Partin AW; Walsh PC; Kattan MW; Scardino PT; Montie JE; Pearson JD; Slezak JM; Zincke H
    J Urol; 2000 Nov; 164(5):1591-5. PubMed ID: 11025711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of 2001 Partin tables in Turkey: a multicenter study.
    Eskicorapci SY; Karabulut E; Türkeri L; Baltaci S; Cal C; Toktas G; Akpinar H; Ozer G; Sozen S; Tokuc R; Lekili M; Soylu A; Albayrak S; Sahin H; Alpar R; Ozen H
    Eur Urol; 2005 Feb; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15661412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The newer the better? Comparison of the 1997 and 2001 partin tables for pathologic stage prediction of prostate cancer in China.
    Gao X; Ren S; Lu X; Xu C; Sun Y
    Urology; 2008 Nov; 72(5):1096-101. PubMed ID: 18822453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing 3-T multiparametric MRI and the Partin tables to predict organ-confined prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Gupta RT; Faridi KF; Singh AA; Passoni NM; Garcia-Reyes K; Madden JF; Polascik TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 32(8):1292-9. PubMed ID: 24863013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Limitations of Elastography Based Prostate Biopsy: J. Schiffmann, M. Grindei, Z. Tian, D.-J. Yassin, T. Steinwender, S.-R. Leyh-Bannurah, M. Randazzo, M. Kwiatkowski, P. I. Karakiewicz, P. Hammerer and L. Manka J Urol 2016;195:1731-1736.
    Grey AD; Ahmed HU
    J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):263-264. PubMed ID: 27765703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: Felix K. Chun, Alexandre de la Taille, Hendrik van Poppel, et al. Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol 2009;56:659-68.
    Morote J
    Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):e1; author reply e2-3. PubMed ID: 19853371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial neural network analysis for predicting pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer in the Japanese population.
    Matsui Y; Egawa S; Tsukayama C; Terai A; Kuwao S; Baba S; Arai Y
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 Dec; 32(12):530-5. PubMed ID: 12578902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of Partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology consensus on Gleason grading: data from the Clinicopathological Research Group for Localized Prostate Cancer.
    Naito S; Kuroiwa K; Kinukawa N; Goto K; Koga H; Ogawa O; Murai M; Shiraishi T;
    J Urol; 2008 Sep; 180(3):904-9; discussion 909-10. PubMed ID: 18635221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partin Tables cannot accurately predict the pathological stage at radical prostatectomy.
    Bhojani N; Ahyai S; Graefen M; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Shariat SF; Jeldres C; Erbersdobler A; Schlomm T; Haese A; Steuber T; Heinzer H; Montorsi F; Huland H; Karakiewicz PI
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Feb; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 18786800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Re: Markus Graefen, Thorsten Schlomm. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: some questions are answered, but many questions remain. Eur Urol 2013;63:604-5.
    Somford DM
    Eur Urol; 2013 Sep; 64(3):e65-6. PubMed ID: 23590811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostate cancers detected by saturation repeat biopsy impairs the Partin tables' accuracy to predict final pathological stage.
    Augustin H; Auprich M; Mannweiler S; Pachernegg O; Al-Ali BM; Pummer K
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):363-8. PubMed ID: 22093162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of accuracy among three generations of Partin tables in a Chinese cohort.
    Xiao WJ; Ye DW; Yao XD; Zhang SL; Dai B; Wang CF; Wang J; Zhang HL; Shen YJ; Zhu Y; Zhu YP; Shi GH; Ma CG; Qin XJ; Lin GW
    Can J Urol; 2011 Apr; 18(2):5619-24. PubMed ID: 21504650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Radiologic Staging With Multiparametric MRI Enhance the Accuracy of the Partin Tables in Predicting Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer?
    Gupta RT; Brown AF; Silverman RK; Tay KJ; Madden JF; George DJ; Polascik TJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Jul; 207(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 27064383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Re: Martin Spahn, Steven Joniau, Paolo Gontero, et al. Outcome predictors of radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate-specific antigen greater than 20 ng/ml: a European multi-institutional study of 712 patients. Eur Urol 2010;58:1-7.
    Neulander EZ; Wejsman Z
    Eur Urol; 2010 Sep; 58(3):e36; author reply e37-8. PubMed ID: 20605673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.