205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12933459)
1. Dynamic multidetector CT of breast tumors: diagnostic features and comparison with conventional techniques.
Inoue M; Sano T; Watai R; Ashikaga R; Ueda K; Watatani M; Nishimura Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):679-86. PubMed ID: 12933459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MDCT of the breast.
Perrone A; Lo Mele L; Sassi S; Marini M; Testaverde L; Izzo L; Marini M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jun; 190(6):1644-51. PubMed ID: 18492919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breast lesions on chest computed tomography: pictorial review with mammography and ultrasound correlation.
Bin Saeedan M; Mobara M; Arafah MA; Mohammed TL
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2015; 44(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 25442730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.
Stavros AT; Thickman D; Rapp CL; Dennis MA; Parker SH; Sisney GA
Radiology; 1995 Jul; 196(1):123-34. PubMed ID: 7784555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography in breast lesions: effect on differential diagnosis after mammography and gray scale sonography.
Zdemir A; Kiliç K; Ozdemir H; Yücel C; Andaç S; Colak M
J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Feb; 23(2):183-95; quiz 196-7. PubMed ID: 14992355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography using a microbubble echo-enhancing agent in evaluation of small breast lesions.
Kook SH; Kwag HJ
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jun; 31(5):227-38. PubMed ID: 12767017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Springer P; Obrist P; Dünser M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Oct; 173(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 10511149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.
Liberman L; Morris EA; Lee MJ; Kaplan JB; LaTrenta LR; Menell JH; Abramson AF; Dashnaw SM; Ballon DJ; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast lesion detection and characterization at contrast-enhanced MR mammography: gadobenate dimeglumine versus gadopentetate dimeglumine.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Occhiato R; Venditti F; Fraioli F; Napoli A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16126926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Criteria of dignity in ultrasound mammography using a 10-MHz-transducer, also with regard to tumor size].
Marquet KL; Wolter M; Handt S; Rath W; Stressig R; Kozlowski P; Funk A
Ultraschall Med; 2002 Dec; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 12514754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ying X; Lin Y; Xia X; Hu B; Zhu Z; He P
Breast J; 2012; 18(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22356352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Critical review of 215 cases of non-palpable mammary lesions].
Pastore G; Marano P; Romani M; Costantini M; Belli P
Radiol Med; 1999 May; 97(5):344-8. PubMed ID: 10432964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic imaging strategy for MDCT- or MRI-detected breast lesions: use of targeted sonography.
Nakano S; Ohtsuka M; Mibu A; Karikomi M; Sakata H; Yamamoto M
BMC Med Imaging; 2012 Jun; 12():13. PubMed ID: 22691539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.
Zhi H; Ou B; Luo BM; Feng X; Wen YL; Yang HY
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jun; 26(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 17526612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic appearance of mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Lam WW; Chu WC; Tse GM; Ma TK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Apr; 182(4):1069-74. PubMed ID: 15039190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
