205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12933459)
21. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging.
Hlawatsch A; Teifke A; Schmidt M; Thelen M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Dec; 179(6):1493-501. PubMed ID: 12438043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical significance of multidetector-row computed tomography in breast surgery.
Doihara H; Fujita T; Takabatake D; Takahashi H; Ogasawara Y; Shimizu N
Breast J; 2006; 12(5 Suppl 2):S204-9. PubMed ID: 16959003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, multidetector row computed tomography, ultrasonography, and mammography for tumor extension of breast cancer.
Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Dec; 112(3):461-74. PubMed ID: 18193352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Automated mammary sonography and mammography: the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions].
Richter K; Hamm B; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Fobbe F; Prihoda H; Schmitt KJ; Frohberg HD; Winzer KJ; Aldinger HU; Guski H; Döinghaus K; Löhr G
Rofo; 1998 Sep; 169(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 9779063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Analysis of sonographic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast tumors of different sizes.
Chen SC; Cheung YC; Su CH; Chen MF; Hwang TL; Hsueh S
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb; 23(2):188-93. PubMed ID: 14770402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses.
McNicholas MM; Mercer PM; Miller JC; McDermott EW; O'Higgins NJ; MacErlean DP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Oct; 161(4):765-71. PubMed ID: 8372754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Impact of the qualitative morphology descriptors on the diagnosis of breast lesions.
Mohamed Kamal R; Hussien Helal M; Wessam R; Mahmoud Mansour S; Godda I; Alieldin N
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jun; 84(6):1049-55. PubMed ID: 25818731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Imaging findings and accuracy of core needle biopsy in mucinous carcinoma of the breast.
Bode MK; Rissanen T
Acta Radiol; 2011 Mar; 52(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 21498339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Analysis of the results of 137 subclinical breast lesions excisions. Value of ultrasonography in the early diagnosis of breast cancer].
Jacob D; Brombart JC; Muller C; Lefèbvre C; Massa F; Depoerck A
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 9091540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography?
Kamal RM; Helal MH; Mansour SM; Haggag MA; Nada OM; Farahat IG; Alieldin NH
Br J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 89(1064):20160157. PubMed ID: 27327403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Limitations in distinguishing malignant from benign lesions of the breast by systematic review of mammograms.
Monostori Z; Herman PG; Carmody DP; Eacobacci TM; Capece NR; Cruz VM; Gentin S; Vernace FM
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Dec; 173(6):438-42. PubMed ID: 1948599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. High-spatial-resolution MR imaging of focal breast masses: interpretation model based on kinetic and morphological parameters.
Tozaki M; Igarashi T; Matsushima S; Fukuda K
Radiat Med; 2005 Feb; 23(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 15786751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ.
Yang WT; Tse GM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jan; 182(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 14684521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, MRI, and 18 F-FDG PET-CT features.
Lee YJ; Choi BB; Suh KS
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 24938660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. False-positive findings at contrast-enhanced breast MRI: a BI-RADS descriptor study.
Baltzer PA; Benndorf M; Dietzel M; Gajda M; Runnebaum IB; Kaiser WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1658-63. PubMed ID: 20489110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Role of multidetector computed tomography in evaluating incidentally detected breast lesions.
Moschetta M; Scardapane A; Lorusso V; Rella L; Telegrafo M; Serio G; Angelelli G; Ianora AA
Tumori; 2015; 101(4):455-60. PubMed ID: 25908028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
