250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12934178)
1. Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial.
Dragsted UB; Gerstoft J; Pedersen C; Peters B; Duran A; Obel N; Castagna A; Cahn P; Clumeck N; Bruun JN; Benetucci J; Hill A; Cassetti I; Vernazza P; Youle M; Fox Z; Lundgren JD;
J Infect Dis; 2003 Sep; 188(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 12934178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 48-week efficacy of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in patients with undetectable viral load after 3 years of antiretroviral therapy.
Cardiello P; Srasuebkul P; Hassink E; Mahanontharit A; Samor T; Ruxrungtham K; Lange J; Cooper D; Phanuphak P
HIV Med; 2005 Mar; 6(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15807718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Boosted versus unboosted indinavir with zidovudine and lamivudine in nucleoside pre-treated patients: a randomized, open-label trial with 112 weeks of follow-up (HIV-NAT 005).
Boyd MA; Srasuebkul P; Khongphattanayothin M; Ruxrungtham K; Hassink EA; Duncombe CJ; Ubolyam S; Burger DM; Reiss P; Stek M; Lange J; Cooper DA; Phanuphak P
Antivir Ther; 2006; 11(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 16640103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The danish protease inhibitor study: a randomized study comparing the virological efficacy of 3 protease inhibitor-containing regimens for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
Katzenstein TL; Kirk O; Pedersen C; Lundgren JD; Nielsen H; Obel N; Nielsen C; Mathiesen LR; Gerstoft J
J Infect Dis; 2000 Sep; 182(3):744-50. PubMed ID: 10950767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twice-daily amprenavir 1200 mg versus amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg, in combination with at least 2 other antiretroviral drugs, in HIV-1-infected patients.
Nadler JP; Gathe JC; Pollard RB; Richmond GJ; Liao Q; Griffith S; Lancaster CT; Hernandez JE; Pappa KA;
BMC Infect Dis; 2003 Jun; 3():10. PubMed ID: 12795812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Once-daily dosing of saquinavir soft-gel capsules and ritonavir combination in HIV-1-infected patients (IMEA015 study).
Lamotte C; Landman R; Peytavin G; Mentre F; Gerbe J; Brun-Vezinet F; Boue F; Spiridon G; Valantin MA; Michelet C; Farinotti R; Yeni P
Antivir Ther; 2004 Apr; 9(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 15134187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indinavir/ritonavir-based therapy in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive patients: comparison of 800/100 mg and 400/100 mg twice daily.
Konopnicki D; De Wit S; Poll B; Crommentuyn K; Huitema A; Clumeck N
HIV Med; 2005 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15670245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a switch in antiretroviral therapy to saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir alone for 48 weeks and a switch in the saquinavir formulation.
Winston A; Mallon PW; Satchell C; MacRae K; Williams KM; Schutz M; Law M; Cooper DA; Emery S
Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 44(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 17479946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fosamprenavir/ritonavir in advanced HIV disease (TRIAD): a randomized study of high-dose, dual-boosted or standard dose fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients with antiretroviral resistance.
Molina JM; Ait-Khaled M; Rinaldi R; Penco G; Baril JG; Cauda R; Soriano V; Pialoux G; Wire MB; Lou Y; Givens N; Craig C; Nichols WG; Barbosa I; Yeo J;
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Aug; 64(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 19515730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir + saquinavir/ritonavir) regimen in HIV-infected patients who failed treatment with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Chetchotisakd P; Anunnatsiri S; Mootsikapun P; Kiertiburanakul S; Anekthananon T; Bowonwatanuwong C; Kowadisaiburana B; Supparatpinyo K; Ruxrungtham K;
HIV Med; 2007 Nov; 8(8):529-35. PubMed ID: 17944686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial to evaluate lopinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: the MaxCmin2 trial.
Dragsted UB; Gerstoft J; Youle M; Fox Z; Losso M; Benetucci J; Jayaweera DT; Rieger A; Bruun JN; Castagna A; Gazzard B; Walmsley S; Hill A; Lundgren JD;
Antivir Ther; 2005; 10(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 16218173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of ritonavir/indinavir 100/400 mg twice daily in combination with two nucleoside analogues in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals.
Duvivier C; Myrto A; Marcelin AG; Ghosn J; Ait-Mohand H; Schneider L; Agher R; Bricaire F; Costagliola D; Calvez V; Peytavin G; Katlama C
Antivir Ther; 2003 Dec; 8(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 14760894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continued indinavir versus switching to indinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viral load.
Arnaiz JA; Mallolas J; Podzamczer D; Gerstoft J; Lundgren JD; Cahn P; Fätkenheuer G; D'Arminio-Monforte A; Casiró A; Reiss P; Burger DM; Stek M; Gatell JM;
AIDS; 2003 Apr; 17(6):831-40. PubMed ID: 12660530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regimen-dependent variations in adherence to therapy and virological suppression in patients initiating protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy.
Moore DM; Hogg RS; Yip B; Wood E; Harris M; Montaner JS
HIV Med; 2006 Jul; 7(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 16945076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of treatment intensification in HIV-infection: a study comparing treatment with ritonavir/saquinavir and ritonavir/saquinavir/stavudine. Prometheus Study Group.
Gisolf EH; Jurriaans S; Pelgrom J; van Wanzeele F; van der Ende ME; Brinkman K; Borst MJ; de Wolf F; Japour AJ; Danner SA
AIDS; 2000 Mar; 14(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 10770543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures.
Johnson M; Grinsztejn B; Rodriguez C; Coco J; DeJesus E; Lazzarin A; Lichtenstein K; Wirtz V; Rightmire A; Odeshoo L; McLaren C
AIDS; 2006 Mar; 20(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 16514301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lopinavir/ritonavir vs. indinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral naive HIV-infected patients: immunovirological outcome and side effects.
Bongiovanni M; Bini T; Chiesa E; Cicconi P; Adorni F; Monforte d'Arminio A
Antiviral Res; 2004 Apr; 62(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15026202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term efficacy and safety of twice-daily saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SGC), with or without nelfinavir, and three times daily saquinavir-SGC, in triple combination therapy for HIV infection: 100-week follow-up.
Greenberg RN; Feinberg J; Goodrich J; Pilson RS; Siemon-Hryczyk P
Antivir Ther; 2003 Feb; 8(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 12713062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Therapeutic drug monitoring of saquinavir in patients during protease inhibitor therapy with saquinavir alone or in combination with ritonavir or nelfinavir.
Langmann P; Zilly M; Weissbrich B; Schlör C; Väth T; Richter E; Klinker H
Eur J Med Res; 2000 Feb; 5(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 10720564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study of efficacy and safety of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive Thai patients.
Ananworanich J; Hill A; Siangphoe U; Ruxrungtham K; Prasithsirikul W; Chetchotisakd P; Kiertiburanakul S; Munsakul W; Raksakulkarn P; Tansuphasawadikul S; Nuesch R; Cooper DA; Hirschel B;
Antivir Ther; 2005; 10(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 16218176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
