These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12934178)
1. Randomized trial to evaluate indinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients: the MaxCmin1 Trial. Dragsted UB; Gerstoft J; Pedersen C; Peters B; Duran A; Obel N; Castagna A; Cahn P; Clumeck N; Bruun JN; Benetucci J; Hill A; Cassetti I; Vernazza P; Youle M; Fox Z; Lundgren JD; J Infect Dis; 2003 Sep; 188(5):635-42. PubMed ID: 12934178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The 48-week efficacy of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir in patients with undetectable viral load after 3 years of antiretroviral therapy. Cardiello P; Srasuebkul P; Hassink E; Mahanontharit A; Samor T; Ruxrungtham K; Lange J; Cooper D; Phanuphak P HIV Med; 2005 Mar; 6(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15807718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Boosted versus unboosted indinavir with zidovudine and lamivudine in nucleoside pre-treated patients: a randomized, open-label trial with 112 weeks of follow-up (HIV-NAT 005). Boyd MA; Srasuebkul P; Khongphattanayothin M; Ruxrungtham K; Hassink EA; Duncombe CJ; Ubolyam S; Burger DM; Reiss P; Stek M; Lange J; Cooper DA; Phanuphak P Antivir Ther; 2006; 11(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 16640103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The danish protease inhibitor study: a randomized study comparing the virological efficacy of 3 protease inhibitor-containing regimens for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. Katzenstein TL; Kirk O; Pedersen C; Lundgren JD; Nielsen H; Obel N; Nielsen C; Mathiesen LR; Gerstoft J J Infect Dis; 2000 Sep; 182(3):744-50. PubMed ID: 10950767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twice-daily amprenavir 1200 mg versus amprenavir 600 mg/ritonavir 100 mg, in combination with at least 2 other antiretroviral drugs, in HIV-1-infected patients. Nadler JP; Gathe JC; Pollard RB; Richmond GJ; Liao Q; Griffith S; Lancaster CT; Hernandez JE; Pappa KA; BMC Infect Dis; 2003 Jun; 3():10. PubMed ID: 12795812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Once-daily dosing of saquinavir soft-gel capsules and ritonavir combination in HIV-1-infected patients (IMEA015 study). Lamotte C; Landman R; Peytavin G; Mentre F; Gerbe J; Brun-Vezinet F; Boue F; Spiridon G; Valantin MA; Michelet C; Farinotti R; Yeni P Antivir Ther; 2004 Apr; 9(2):247-56. PubMed ID: 15134187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Indinavir/ritonavir-based therapy in HIV-1-infected antiretroviral therapy-naive patients: comparison of 800/100 mg and 400/100 mg twice daily. Konopnicki D; De Wit S; Poll B; Crommentuyn K; Huitema A; Clumeck N HIV Med; 2005 Jan; 6(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15670245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic profile of a switch in antiretroviral therapy to saquinavir, ritonavir, and atazanavir alone for 48 weeks and a switch in the saquinavir formulation. Winston A; Mallon PW; Satchell C; MacRae K; Williams KM; Schutz M; Law M; Cooper DA; Emery S Clin Infect Dis; 2007 Jun; 44(11):1475-83. PubMed ID: 17479946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fosamprenavir/ritonavir in advanced HIV disease (TRIAD): a randomized study of high-dose, dual-boosted or standard dose fosamprenavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients with antiretroviral resistance. Molina JM; Ait-Khaled M; Rinaldi R; Penco G; Baril JG; Cauda R; Soriano V; Pialoux G; Wire MB; Lou Y; Givens N; Craig C; Nichols WG; Barbosa I; Yeo J; J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Aug; 64(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 19515730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and tolerability of a double boosted protease inhibitor (lopinavir + saquinavir/ritonavir) regimen in HIV-infected patients who failed treatment with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Chetchotisakd P; Anunnatsiri S; Mootsikapun P; Kiertiburanakul S; Anekthananon T; Bowonwatanuwong C; Kowadisaiburana B; Supparatpinyo K; Ruxrungtham K; HIV Med; 2007 Nov; 8(8):529-35. PubMed ID: 17944686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial to evaluate lopinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: the MaxCmin2 trial. Dragsted UB; Gerstoft J; Youle M; Fox Z; Losso M; Benetucci J; Jayaweera DT; Rieger A; Bruun JN; Castagna A; Gazzard B; Walmsley S; Hill A; Lundgren JD; Antivir Ther; 2005; 10(6):735-43. PubMed ID: 16218173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and safety of ritonavir/indinavir 100/400 mg twice daily in combination with two nucleoside analogues in antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-infected individuals. Duvivier C; Myrto A; Marcelin AG; Ghosn J; Ait-Mohand H; Schneider L; Agher R; Bricaire F; Costagliola D; Calvez V; Peytavin G; Katlama C Antivir Ther; 2003 Dec; 8(6):603-9. PubMed ID: 14760894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continued indinavir versus switching to indinavir/ritonavir in HIV-infected patients with suppressed viral load. Arnaiz JA; Mallolas J; Podzamczer D; Gerstoft J; Lundgren JD; Cahn P; Fätkenheuer G; D'Arminio-Monforte A; Casiró A; Reiss P; Burger DM; Stek M; Gatell JM; AIDS; 2003 Apr; 17(6):831-40. PubMed ID: 12660530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Regimen-dependent variations in adherence to therapy and virological suppression in patients initiating protease inhibitor-based highly active antiretroviral therapy. Moore DM; Hogg RS; Yip B; Wood E; Harris M; Montaner JS HIV Med; 2006 Jul; 7(5):311-6. PubMed ID: 16945076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of treatment intensification in HIV-infection: a study comparing treatment with ritonavir/saquinavir and ritonavir/saquinavir/stavudine. Prometheus Study Group. Gisolf EH; Jurriaans S; Pelgrom J; van Wanzeele F; van der Ende ME; Brinkman K; Borst MJ; de Wolf F; Japour AJ; Danner SA AIDS; 2000 Mar; 14(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 10770543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. Johnson M; Grinsztejn B; Rodriguez C; Coco J; DeJesus E; Lazzarin A; Lichtenstein K; Wirtz V; Rightmire A; Odeshoo L; McLaren C AIDS; 2006 Mar; 20(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 16514301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lopinavir/ritonavir vs. indinavir/ritonavir in antiretroviral naive HIV-infected patients: immunovirological outcome and side effects. Bongiovanni M; Bini T; Chiesa E; Cicconi P; Adorni F; Monforte d'Arminio A Antiviral Res; 2004 Apr; 62(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 15026202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term efficacy and safety of twice-daily saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SGC), with or without nelfinavir, and three times daily saquinavir-SGC, in triple combination therapy for HIV infection: 100-week follow-up. Greenberg RN; Feinberg J; Goodrich J; Pilson RS; Siemon-Hryczyk P Antivir Ther; 2003 Feb; 8(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 12713062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Therapeutic drug monitoring of saquinavir in patients during protease inhibitor therapy with saquinavir alone or in combination with ritonavir or nelfinavir. Langmann P; Zilly M; Weissbrich B; Schlör C; Väth T; Richter E; Klinker H Eur J Med Res; 2000 Feb; 5(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 10720564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective study of efficacy and safety of once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in treatment-naive Thai patients. Ananworanich J; Hill A; Siangphoe U; Ruxrungtham K; Prasithsirikul W; Chetchotisakd P; Kiertiburanakul S; Munsakul W; Raksakulkarn P; Tansuphasawadikul S; Nuesch R; Cooper DA; Hirschel B; Antivir Ther; 2005; 10(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 16218176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]