BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

531 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12934502)

  • 1. [Bifocal contact lenses as a correction method in presbyopia].
    Avetisov SE; Rybakova EG; Egorova GB; Churkina MN; Borodina NV; Boev VI
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2003; 119(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 12934502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.
    Ueda K; Inagaki Y
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Mar; 33(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 17496703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient response to concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Harris MG; Sheedy JE; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1991 May; 62(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 1813535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of near visual acuity and reading metrics in presbyopia correction.
    Gupta N; Wolffsohn JS; Naroo SA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Aug; 35(8):1401-9. PubMed ID: 19631128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of suppression, stereoacuity, and interocular differences in visual acuity in monovision and acuvue bifocal contact lenses.
    Kirschen DG; Hung CC; Nakano TR
    Optom Vis Sci; 1999 Dec; 76(12):832-7. PubMed ID: 10612404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contact lens correction of presbyopia.
    Bennett ES
    Clin Exp Optom; 2008 May; 91(3):265-78. PubMed ID: 18201225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual performance of two simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.
    Madrid-Costa D; García-Lázaro S; Albarrán-Diego C; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jan; 33(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 23252854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is binocular contrast sensitivity at distance compromised with multifocal soft contact lenses used to correct presbyopia?
    Soni PS; Patel R; Carlson RS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Jul; 80(7):505-14. PubMed ID: 12858086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of vision with presbyopic contact lens correction: subjective and light sensitivity rating.
    Alongi S; Rolando M; Corallo G; Siniscalchi C; Monaco M; Saccà S; Verrastro G; Menoni S; Ravera GB; Calabria G
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2001 Sep; 239(9):656-63. PubMed ID: 11688664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contrast sensitivity measurements with the Echelon diffractive bifocal contact lens as compared to bifocal spectacles.
    Sanislo S; Wicker D; Green DG
    CLAO J; 1992 Jul; 18(3):161-4. PubMed ID: 1499121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses.
    Callina T; Reynolds TP
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical experience with the SimulVue soft bifocal contact lens.
    Bierly JR; Furgason TG; Litteral G; VanMeter WS
    CLAO J; 1995 Apr; 21(2):96-8. PubMed ID: 7796528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spectacles and custom toric hydrogel contact lenses: a comparison of vision.
    Hall DK; Ward JA; Edmondson W
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Nov; 65(11):783-7. PubMed ID: 7822676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Task and visual performance with concentric bifocal contact lenses.
    Sheedy JE; Harris MG; Bronge MR; Joe SM; Mook MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jul; 68(7):537-41. PubMed ID: 1923325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual performance of a multi-zone bifocal and a progressive multifocal contact lens.
    Guillon M; Maissa C; Cooper P; Girard-Claudon K; Poling TR
    CLAO J; 2002 Apr; 28(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 12054378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting and assessing visual performance with multizone bifocal contact lenses.
    Martin JA; Roorda A
    Optom Vis Sci; 2003 Dec; 80(12):812-9. PubMed ID: 14688544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.