182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12934580)
1. US Supreme Court ruling affirms strict criteria for involuntary medication of defendants to gain competency.
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Aug; 54(8):1177. PubMed ID: 12934580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary medication to restore trial competency--a workable standard?
Gerbasi JB; Scott CL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 15497635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Sell effect: involuntary medication treatment is a "clear and convincing" success.
Cochrane RE; Herbel BL; Reardon ML; Lloyd KP
Law Hum Behav; 2013 Apr; 37(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 22746284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2004 May; 350(22):2297-301. PubMed ID: 15163782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Justices restrict forced medication preceding a trial: mental competency issue. In 6-3 ruling, court says use of drugs must be in best interest of defendant.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Jun; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 14621709
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
Leong GB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medication of criminal defendants.
Westreich LM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(4):504. PubMed ID: 11785623
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Forcing psychiatric drugs on defendants is weighed.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 2003 Mar; ():A18. PubMed ID: 12812160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for determining restorability of competency to stand trial and recommendations for involuntary treatment.
Cochrane RE; Laxton KL; Mulay AL; Herbel BL
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1201-1209. PubMed ID: 34032278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. At law. One flew over the Supreme Court.
Annas GJ
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 1973926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dannie Abse.
Abse D
Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9380):336. PubMed ID: 12892982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Law & psychiatry: Treatment of incompetent, dangerous criminal defendants: parsing the law.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2012 Jul; 63(7):630-2. PubMed ID: 22752031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pro se competence in the aftermath of Indiana v. Edwards.
Morris DR; Frierson RL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 19092075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Connecticut Experience with
Norko MA; Cotterell MS; Hollis T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):473-483. PubMed ID: 32675332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treating incompetent defendants: the Supreme Court's decision is a tough Sell.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1335-6,1341. PubMed ID: 14557516
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating Competency for Execution after
Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2020 Dec; 48(4):530-535. PubMed ID: 32675330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Involuntary electro-convulsive therapy to restore competency to stand trial: a five year study in New York State.
Ladds B
J Forensic Sci; 1995 Mar; 40(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 7602274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
