These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12935338)

  • 1. Tests for gene clustering.
    Durand D; Sankoff D
    J Comput Biol; 2003; 10(3-4):453-82. PubMed ID: 12935338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting gene clusters under evolutionary constraint in a large number of genomes.
    Ling X; He X; Xin D
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 25(5):571-7. PubMed ID: 19158161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Algorithms for computing parsimonious evolutionary scenarios for genome evolution, the last universal common ancestor and dominance of horizontal gene transfer in the evolution of prokaryotes.
    Mirkin BG; Fenner TI; Galperin MY; Koonin EV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2003 Jan; 3():2. PubMed ID: 12515582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistics for approximate gene clusters.
    Jahn K; Winter S; Stoye J; Böcker S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013; 14 Suppl 15(Suppl 15):S14. PubMed ID: 24564620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. New Genome Similarity Measures based on Conserved Gene Adjacencies.
    Doerr D; Kowada LAB; Araujo E; Deshpande S; Dantas S; Moret BME; Stoye J
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):616-634. PubMed ID: 28590847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three Dimensional Organization of Genome Might Have Guided the Dynamics of Gene Order Evolution in Eukaryotes.
    Bagadia M; Singh A; Singh Sandhu K
    Genome Biol Evol; 2016 Apr; 8(3):946-54. PubMed ID: 26957031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clustering of gene ontology terms in genomes.
    Tiirikka T; Siermala M; Vihinen M
    Gene; 2014 Oct; 550(2):155-64. PubMed ID: 24995610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Genome alignment, evolution of prokaryotic genome organization, and prediction of gene function using genomic context.
    Wolf YI; Rogozin IB; Kondrashov AS; Koonin EV
    Genome Res; 2001 Mar; 11(3):356-72. PubMed ID: 11230160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative genomics of ParaHox clusters of teleost fishes: gene cluster breakup and the retention of gene sets following whole genome duplications.
    Siegel N; Hoegg S; Salzburger W; Braasch I; Meyer A
    BMC Genomics; 2007 Sep; 8():312. PubMed ID: 17822543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Two plus two does not equal three: statistical tests for multiple genome comparison.
    Raghupathy N; Hoberman R; Durand D
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2008 Feb; 6(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 18324742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unraveling ancient hexaploidy through multiply-aligned angiosperm gene maps.
    Tang H; Wang X; Bowers JE; Ming R; Alam M; Paterson AH
    Genome Res; 2008 Dec; 18(12):1944-54. PubMed ID: 18832442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Methods for Reconstructing Ancient Genome Organization.
    Anselmetti Y; Luhmann N; Bérard S; Tannier E; Chauve C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1704():343-362. PubMed ID: 29277873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome trees constructed using five different approaches suggest new major bacterial clades.
    Wolf YI; Rogozin IB; Grishin NV; Tatusov RL; Koonin EV
    BMC Evol Biol; 2001 Oct; 1():8. PubMed ID: 11734060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 18. Comparative analysis of chromosome maps and synteny with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Llorente B; Malpertuy A; Neuvéglise C; de Montigny J; Aigle M; Artiguenave F; Blandin G; Bolotin-Fukuhara M; Bon E; Brottier P; Casaregola S; Durrens P; Gaillardin C; Lépingle A; Ozier-Kalogéropoulos O; Potier S; Saurin W; Tekaia F; Toffano-Nioche C; Wésolowski-Louvel M; Wincker P; Weissenbach J; Souciet J; Dujon B
    FEBS Lett; 2000 Dec; 487(1):101-12. PubMed ID: 11152893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The statistical analysis of spatially clustered genes under the maximum gap criterion.
    Hoberman R; Sankoff D; Durand D
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Oct; 12(8):1083-102. PubMed ID: 16241899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reconstruction of ancestral gene orders using intermediate genomes.
    Feijão P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 14(Suppl 14):S3. PubMed ID: 26451811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Finding approximate gene clusters with Gecko 3.
    Winter S; Jahn K; Wehner S; Kuchenbecker L; Marz M; Stoye J; Böcker S
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Nov; 44(20):9600-9610. PubMed ID: 27679480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive evolution of chloroplast genome structure inferred using a parametric bootstrap approach.
    Cui L; Leebens-Mack J; Wang LS; Tang J; Rymarquis L; Stern DB; dePamphilis CW
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Feb; 6():13. PubMed ID: 16469102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rearrangement analysis of multiple bacterial genomes.
    Noureen M; Tada I; Kawashima T; Arita M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 23):631. PubMed ID: 31881830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. G-NEST: a gene neighborhood scoring tool to identify co-conserved, co-expressed genes.
    Lemay DG; Martin WF; Hinrichs AS; Rijnkels M; German JB; Korf I; Pollard KS
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Sep; 13():253. PubMed ID: 23020263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.