These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1293539)
1. Construction of a model eye and its applications. Rudnicka AR; Edgar DF; Bennett AG Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Oct; 12(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 1293539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerised calculation scheme for ocular magnification with the Zeiss telecentric fundus camera. Langenbucher A; Seitz B; Viestenz A Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2003 Sep; 23(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 12950891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of cataract surgery and IOL implantation on the magnification of a fundus photograph: a pilot study. Knaapi L; Lehtonen T; Vesti E Acta Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 95(8):839-841. PubMed ID: 28371281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Magnification characteristic of a +90-diopter double-aspheric fundus examination lens. Ansari-Shahrezaei S; Stur M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Jun; 43(6):1817-9. PubMed ID: 12036984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Schmucker C; Schaeffel F Vision Res; 2004; 44(16):1857-67. PubMed ID: 15145680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical verification of the formula of Bennett et al. (1994) of determining the size of retinal features by fundus photography. Knaapi L; Aarnisalo E; Vesti E; Leinonen MT Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 May; 93(3):248-52. PubMed ID: 25270771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic. Langenbucher A; Reese S; Jakob C; Seitz B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15315660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vivo biometry in the mouse eye with low coherence interferometry. Schmucker C; Schaeffel F Vision Res; 2004; 44(21):2445-56. PubMed ID: 15358080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal development of refractive state and ocular dimensions in guinea pigs. Zhou X; Qu J; Xie R; Wang R; Jiang L; Zhao H; Wen J; Lu F Vision Res; 2006 Sep; 46(18):2815-23. PubMed ID: 16723148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A BASIC computer program for schematic and reduced eye construction. O'Keefe LP; Coile DC Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):97-100. PubMed ID: 3419831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Distribution of ocular biometric parameters and refraction in a population-based study of Australian children. Ojaimi E; Rose KA; Morgan IG; Smith W; Martin FJ; Kifley A; Robaei D; Mitchell P Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Aug; 46(8):2748-54. PubMed ID: 16043846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the ocular refractive components: the Reykjavik Eye Study. Olsen T; Arnarsson A; Sasaki H; Sasaki K; Jonasson F Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Jun; 85(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 17286626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A biometric investigation of ocular components in amblyopia. Cass K; Tromans C Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Sep; 28(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 18761480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross-sectional study. Carney LG; Mainstone JC; Henderson BA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9040463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optic disc photogrammetry: magnification factors for eye position, centration, and ametropias, refractive and axial; and their application in the diagnosis of optic nerve hypoplasia. Pach J; Pennell DO; Romano PE Ann Ophthalmol; 1989 Dec; 21(12):454-62. PubMed ID: 2627096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Emmetropization and schematic eye models in developing pigmented guinea pigs. Howlett MH; McFadden SA Vision Res; 2007 Apr; 47(9):1178-90. PubMed ID: 17360016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]