These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12937408)

  • 21. Digital image processing of radiation therapy portal films.
    Cumberlin RL; Rodgers JE; Fahey FH
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1989; 13(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 2655877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
    Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Denoising images of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry using non-local means filters.
    Al-Antari MA; Al-Masni MA; Metwally MK; Hussain D; Park SJ; Shin JS; Han SM; Kim TS
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):395-412. PubMed ID: 29562584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Digital image processing.
    Lo WY; Puchalski SM
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2008; 49(1 Suppl 1):S42-7. PubMed ID: 18283986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial investigation of mathematical morphology for the digital extraction of the skeletal characteristics of trabecular bone.
    Kumasaka S; Kashima I
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 9442602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of advanced iterative reconstruction methods for SPECT/CT.
    Knoll P; Kotalova D; Köchle G; Kuzelka I; Minear G; Mirzaei S; Sámal M; Zadrazil L; Bergmann H
    Z Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 22(1):58-69. PubMed ID: 21723716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Dose reduction and image quality in MDCT of the upper abdomen: potential of an adaptive post-processing filter].
    Kröpil P; Lanzman RS; Walther C; Röhlen S; Godehardt E; Mödder U; Cohnen M
    Rofo; 2010 Mar; 182(3):248-53. PubMed ID: 19899025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
    Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computed radiography: its impact on radiographers.
    Cesar LJ
    Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 9008016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Short communication: charge-coupled device camera optical density range enhancement and the effect on radiographic image segmentation.
    Chester EG; Sharif BS; Owen JP
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):59-63. PubMed ID: 8785622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness of flexible noise control image processing for digital portal images using computed radiography.
    Yamada S; Murase K
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):519-27. PubMed ID: 15900057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital radiography image denoising using a generative adversarial network.
    Sun Y; Liu X; Cong P; Li L; Zhao Z
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(4):523-534. PubMed ID: 29889095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stenosis quantification in coronary CT angiography: impact of an integrated circuit detector with iterative reconstruction.
    Morsbach F; Desbiolles L; Plass A; Leschka S; Schmidt B; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Stolzmann P
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Jan; 48(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 23192163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Noise suppression in reconstruction of low-Z target megavoltage cone-beam CT images.
    Wang J; Robar J; Guan H
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5111-7. PubMed ID: 22894436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Digital image processing of dentomaxillofacial radiographs.
    Fujita M; Kodera Y; Ogawa M; Tanimoto K; Sunayashiki T; Wada T; Doi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Oct; 64(4):485-93. PubMed ID: 3477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Denoising of iodine-131 images using a median filter.
    Pandey AK; Sharma A; Sharma PD; Saroha K; Parida GK; Bal CS; Kumar R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Apr; 40(4):308-316. PubMed ID: 30589744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimal steel thickness combined with computed radiography for portal imaging of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
    Wu S; Jin X; Xie C; Cao G
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3112-6. PubMed ID: 16279063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Subjective image quality of solid-state and photostimulable phosphor systems for digital intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E; Attaelmanan A; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 10808218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.