These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12937744)

  • 1. [Scientific periodicals: quality criteria].
    Ferreira MC; Krzyzanowski RF
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2003 May; 17 Suppl 1():43-8. PubMed ID: 12937744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Publications: good or bad? Critical appraisal of scientific publications].
    Mádai A; Höltl W
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1998 Jan; 110(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 9531681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Various suggestions for the presentation of manuscripts in biomedical journals].
    Kauffmann R; Reyes H; Goić A
    Rev Med Chil; 1991 Aug; 119(8):933-7. PubMed ID: 1844777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies.
    Fung AE; Palanki R; Bakri SJ; Depperschmidt E; Gibson A
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Feb; 116(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 19091408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press.
    Oxman AD; Guyatt GH; Cook DJ; Jaeschke R; Heddle N; Keller J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1993 Sep; 46(9):987-1001. PubMed ID: 8263584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological adequacy of articles published in two open-access Brazilian cardiology periodicals.
    Macedo CR; Silva DL; Puga ME
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2010; 128(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 20676575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Open access: is the scientific quality of biomedical publications threatened?
    Barreiro E
    Arch Bronconeumol; 2013 Dec; 49(12):505-6. PubMed ID: 24029469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving standards in the scientific biomedical community in Romania by using journal ranking to improve journal quality.
    Robu I; Marineanu D; Aciu I; Wood-Lamont S
    Health Info Libr J; 2001 Jun; 18(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 11780738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Updating the format of journal articles to improve the quality of publications.
    Kim G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Mar; 39(3):483-4; discussion 484. PubMed ID: 23506939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The references in articles published in biomedical journals].
    Reyes H
    Rev Med Chil; 2001 Apr; 129(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 11413985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [How to write a scientific paper].
    Parati G; Valentini M
    Ital Heart J Suppl; 2005 Apr; 6(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 15902941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Brazilian Scientific Journals in Surgery: quality control in the abstract structure of non-experimental articles.
    Guimarães CA; Pellizzon Rde F; Koike MK
    Acta Cir Bras; 2013 Jan; 28(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 23338119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Level of evidence and citation index in current neurosurgical publications.
    Rothoerl RD; Klier J; Woertgen C; Brawanski A
    Neurosurg Rev; 2003 Oct; 26(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 12827519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of the degree of compliance of Spanish scientific biomedical journals with international standards of presentation of periodicals].
    Delgado López-Cózar E
    Rev Esp Salud Publica; 1997; 71(6):531-46. PubMed ID: 9477708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The evaluation of Mexican biomedical journals: a description of the 2005 process for the Artemisa index].
    Araujo-Pulido GT; Vieyra-Avila JA; Meza-Barrera Mde L
    Acta Ortop Mex; 2009; 23(6):366-75. PubMed ID: 20377003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Incidence of the standardization of scientific journals in the transfer and evaluation of scientific information].
    Delgado López-Cózar E
    Rev Neurol; 1997 Dec; 25(148):1942-6. PubMed ID: 9528038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How evidence-based are publications in clinical ophthalmic journals?
    Lai TY; Leung GM; Wong VW; Lam RF; Cheng AC; Lam DS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 May; 47(5):1831-8. PubMed ID: 16638988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement among reviewers of review articles.
    Oxman AD; Guyatt GH; Singer J; Goldsmith CH; Hutchison BG; Milner RA; Streiner DL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1991; 44(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 1824710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality of scientific articles.
    Szklo M
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():30-5. PubMed ID: 16924300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.