These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12937862)

  • 1. Comparison of linear measurements in cephalometric studies.
    Nolte K; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2003 Jul; 64(4):265-74. PubMed ID: 12937862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enlargement and distortion in cephalometric radiography: compensation tables for linear measurements.
    Bergersen EO
    Angle Orthod; 1980 Jul; 50(3):230-44. PubMed ID: 6931505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Craniofacial changes in Icelandic children between 6 and 16 years of age - a longitudinal study.
    Thordarson A; Johannsdottir B; Magnusson TE
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):152-65. PubMed ID: 16230326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A method of magnification correction for posteroanterior radiographic cephalometry.
    Hsiao TH; Chang HP; Liu KM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 9107378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal posteroanterior changes in transverse and vertical craniofacial structures between 10 and 14 years of age.
    Yavuz I; Ikbal A; Baydaş B; Ceylan I
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 15529496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A mixed longitudinal anthropometric study of craniofacial growth of Colombian mestizos 6-17 years of age.
    Arboleda C; Buschang PH; Camacho JA; Botero P; Roldan S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 21097992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian approach to longitudinal craniofacial growth: The Craniofacial Growth Consortium Study.
    Sherwood RJ; Oh HS; Valiathan M; McNulty KP; Duren DL; Knigge RP; Hardin AM; Holzhauser CL; Middleton KM
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2021 May; 304(5):991-1019. PubMed ID: 33015973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and testing of multilevel models for longitudinal craniofacial growth prediction.
    Chvatal BA; Behrents RG; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jul; 128(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 16027625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Craniofacial morphology in unilateral hemifacial microsomia.
    Ongkosuwito EM; van Neck JW; Wattel E; van Adrichem LN; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Dec; 51(8):902-7. PubMed ID: 23201060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between radiographic and sonically produced cephalometric values.
    Prawat JS; Nieberg L; Cisneros GJ; Acs G
    Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 7486241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the correlation between certain reference lines of the Midsagittal plane of the skull and their relation to the Frankfort plane between the ages of four and nineteen. A radiographic-cephalometric cross-sectional investigation.
    Mattila K; Rintala K
    Odontol Tidskr; 1969 Apr; 77(2):97-112. PubMed ID: 5271331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of craniofacial growth in patients with untreated Class III malocclusions and anterior crossbites using the centroid method.
    Murata S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):496-502. PubMed ID: 19549679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of magnification on lateral cephalometric studies.
    Dibbets JM; Nolte K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Aug; 122(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 12165775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion and magnification of four digital cephalometric units.
    Song GY; Li G; Lu WH; Han B; Xu TM
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1644-1653. PubMed ID: 31793469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cephalometric growth norms and inborn anomalies (deviations of the interocular distance and the diagnosis of craniostenosis).
    Smahel Z
    Acta Chir Plast; 1978; 20(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 83761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Roentgen-cephalometric standards for a Swedish population. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.
    Thilander B; Persson M; Adolfsson U
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 16043474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An evaluation of growth changes and treatment effects in Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with conventional roentgenographic cephalometry and finite element method analysis.
    Cangialosi TJ; Moss ML; McAlarney ME; Nirenblatt BD; Yuan M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 8311037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fourier analysis of cephalometric shapes.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Poggio CE; D'Addona A; Taroni A
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1996 May; 33(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 8734720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.