384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12938847)
1. Quantitative effects of a nickel-titanium palatal expander on skeletal and dental structures in the primary and mixed dentition: a preliminary study.
Ferrario VF; Garattini G; Colombo A; Filippi V; Pozzoli S; Sforza C
Eur J Orthod; 2003 Aug; 25(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 12938847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.
Ciambotti C; Ngan P; Durkee M; Kohli K; Kim H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11174532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Rapid maxillary expansion in early-mixed dentition: effectiveness of increasing arch dimension with anchorage on deciduous teeth.
Mutinelli S; Cozzani M
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Jun; 16(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 26147817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of nitanium maxillary expander appliances on dentofacial structures.
Karaman AI
Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):344-54. PubMed ID: 12169035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dentoskeletal effects of a removable appliance for expansion of the maxillary arch: a postero-anterior cephalometric study.
Defraia E; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Tollaro I
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Anchorage onto deciduous teeth: effectiveness of early rapid maxillary expansion in increasing dental arch dimension and improving anterior crowding.
Mutinelli S; Manfredi M; Guiducci A; Denotti G; Cozzani M
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():22. PubMed ID: 26154156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bonded versus banded rapid palatal expander followed by facial mask therapy: analysis on digital dental casts.
Lione R; Huanca Ghislanzoni LT; Defraia E; Franchi L; Cozza P
Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 26070923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rapid maxillary expansion in the deciduous and mixed dentition evaluated through posteroanterior cephalometric analysis.
da Silva Filho OG; Montes LA; Torelly LF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 7879759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical comparison of the quadhelix appliance and the nickel titanium (tandem loop) palatal expander: a preliminary, prospective investigation.
Donohue VE; Marshman LA; Winchester LJ
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Aug; 26(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 15366386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition.
Esenlik E; Rübendüz M
Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26219141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar.
Cozzani M; Rosa M; Cozzani P; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2003; 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 12887575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial to assess the sagittal effects of Transforce transverse appliance (TTA) and NiTi palatal expander (NPE) on skeletal class II malocclusion in growing patients during retention phase - A cephalometric study using a historical control group.
Nagrik AP; Bhad WA; Chavan SJ; Doshi UH
Int Orthod; 2020 Dec; 18(4):722-731. PubMed ID: 33020047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in the maxillary bone morphology using two-arm maxillary expander.
Bratu DC; Bratu EA; Popa G; Luca M; Bălan R; Ogodescu A
Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2012; 53(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22395497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rapid maxillary expansion assisted by palatal mini-implants in adolescents - preliminary study.
Chane-Fane C; Darqué F
Int Orthod; 2015 Mar; 13(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 25665914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: a retrospective study.
Huynh T; Kennedy DB; Joondeph DR; Bollen AM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 19732666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.
Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Drescher D
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of three-dimensional stress distribution and displacement of naso-maxillary complex on application of forces using quad-helix and nickel titanium palatal expander 2 (NPE2): a FEM study.
Kumar A; Ghafoor H; Khanam A
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):17. PubMed ID: 27245236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and biomechanical investigation of a new compound palatal arch.
Wichelhaus A; Sander C; Sander FG
J Orofac Orthop; 2004 Mar; 65(2):104-22. PubMed ID: 15206093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transverse effect of Haas and Hyrax appliances on the upper dental arch in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study.
Façanha AJ; Lara TS; Garib DG; da Silva Filho OG
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):39-45. PubMed ID: 24945513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stress and displacement pattern evaluation using two different palatal expanders in unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Mathew A; Nagachandran KS; Vijayalakshmi D
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):38. PubMed ID: 27800592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
