These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12938875)
1. Efficiency of preparative and process column distribution systems. Gebauer KH; Luo XL; Barton NG; Stokes AN J Chromatogr A; 2003 Jul; 1006(1-2):45-60. PubMed ID: 12938875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of process parameters on the efficiency of chromatographic separations using a cuboid packed-bed device. Chen G; Ghosh R J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2018 Jun; 1086():23-28. PubMed ID: 29654983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating two process scale chromatography column header designs using CFD. Johnson C; Natarajan V; Antoniou C Biotechnol Prog; 2014; 30(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 24616438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cuboid chromatography device having short bed-height gives better protein separation at a significantly lower pressure drop than a taller column having the same bed-volume. Chen G; Roshankhah R; Ghosh R J Chromatogr A; 2021 Jun; 1647():462167. PubMed ID: 33962076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mathematical modelling and evaluation of performance of cuboid packed-bed devices for chromatographic separations. Ghosh R; Chen G J Chromatogr A; 2017 Sep; 1515():138-145. PubMed ID: 28801045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulation and experimental study of the transport of protein bands through cuboid packed-bed devices during chromatographic separations. Chen G; Ghosh R J Chromatogr A; 2020 Mar; 1615():460764. PubMed ID: 31826814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Column-to-column packing variation of disposable pre-packed columns for protein chromatography. Schweiger S; Hinterberger S; Jungbauer A J Chromatogr A; 2017 Dec; 1527():70-79. PubMed ID: 29089107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Critical evaluation and comparison of fluid distribution systems for industrial scale expanded bed adsorption chromatography columns. Arpanaei A; Heebøll-Nielsen A; Hubbuch JJ; Thomas OR; Hobley TJ J Chromatogr A; 2008 Jul; 1198-1199():131-9. PubMed ID: 18538778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling the effects of column packing quality and residence time changes on protein monomer/aggregate separation. McCue JT; Engel P; Thömmes J J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jun; 1216(24):4895-901. PubMed ID: 19419721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visualization of sample introduction in liquid chromatographic columns. Contribution of a flow distributor on the sample band shape. Shalliker RA; Broyles BS; Guiochon G J Chromatogr A; 1999 Dec; 865(1-2):83-95. PubMed ID: 10674932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility study for high-resolution multi-component separation of protein mixture using a cation-exchange cuboid packed-bed device. Chen G; Gerrior A; Ghosh R J Chromatogr A; 2018 May; 1549():25-30. PubMed ID: 29559265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D printed porous media columns with fine control of column packing morphology. Fee C; Nawada S; Dimartino S J Chromatogr A; 2014 Mar; 1333():18-24. PubMed ID: 24529407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tandem columns and mixed-bed columns in high-performance liquid chromatography of proteins. el Rassi Z; Horváth C J Chromatogr; 1986 May; 359():255-64. PubMed ID: 3733930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A flow distribution and collection feature for ensuring scalable uniform flow in a chromatography device. Ghosh R; Chen G; Umatheva U; Gatt P J Chromatogr A; 2020 May; 1618():460892. PubMed ID: 31992474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Theoretical study of twin-column recycling chromatography with a solvent-gradient for preparative binary separations. Wei F; Sang J; Zhao Y J Chromatogr A; 2021 Aug; 1651():462306. PubMed ID: 34139387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the relationship between radial structure heterogeneities and efficiency of chromatographic columns. Gritti F J Chromatogr A; 2018 Jan; 1533():112-126. PubMed ID: 29254865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Packing quality, protein binding capacity and separation efficiency of pre-packed columns ranging from 1 mL laboratory to 57 L industrial scale. Schweiger S; Berger E; Chan A; Peyser J; Gebski C; Jungbauer A J Chromatogr A; 2019 Apr; 1591():79-86. PubMed ID: 30661762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Design of simulated moving bed and Varicol processes for preparative separations with a low number of columns. Pais LS; Rodrigues AE J Chromatogr A; 2003 Jul; 1006(1-2):33-44. PubMed ID: 12938874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of center-cut separations applying simulated moving bed chromatography with 8 zones. Santos da Silva FV; Seidel-Morgenstern A J Chromatogr A; 2016 Jul; 1456():123-36. PubMed ID: 27328885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pressure-flow relationships for packed beds of compressible chromatography media at laboratory and production scale. Stickel JJ; Fotopoulos A Biotechnol Prog; 2001; 17(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 11485438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]