These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939012)

  • 1. Evaluation of bone thickness in the anterior hard palate relative to midsagittal orthodontic implants.
    Henriksen B; Bavitz B; Kelly B; Harn SD
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(4):578-81. PubMed ID: 12939012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implant anchorage in orthodontic practice: the Straumann Orthosystem.
    Thomas MV; Daniel TL; Kluemper T
    Dent Clin North Am; 2006 Jul; 50(3):425-37, vii. PubMed ID: 16818024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical aspects in the use of orthodontic palatal implants.
    Cousley R;
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):723-9. PubMed ID: 15953898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Orthosystem--a new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate.
    Wehrbein H; Glatzmaier J; Mundwiller U; Diedrich P
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Jun; 57(3):142-53. PubMed ID: 8655109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dental CT and orthodontic implants: imaging technique and assessment of available bone volume in the hard palate.
    Gahleitner A; Podesser B; Schick S; Watzek G; Imhof H
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 15294334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Progressive bone adaptation of titanium implants during and after orthodontic load in humans.
    Trisi P; Rebaudi A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Feb; 22(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 11922216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic mini-implant anchorage in adults.
    Kang S; Lee SJ; Ahn SJ; Heo MS; Kim TW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S74-81. PubMed ID: 17448390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extraction treatment using a palatal implant for anchorage.
    Giancotti A; Greco M; Docimo R; Arcuri C
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 14703333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three dimensional anatomical exploration of the anterior hard palate at the level of the third ruga for the placement of mini-implants--a cone-beam CT study.
    Hourfar J; Kanavakis G; Bister D; Schätzle M; Awad L; Nienkemper M; Goldbecher C; Ludwig B
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):589-95. PubMed ID: 25564503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Success rate of palatal orthodontic implants: a prospective longitudinal study.
    Männchen R; Schätzle M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 18492083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The anatomic basis for palatal implants in orthodontics.
    Schlegel KA; Kinner F; Schlegel KD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 12099317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anchorage capacity of osseointegrated and conventional anchorage systems: a randomized controlled trial.
    Feldmann I; Bondemark L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Mar; 133(3):339.e19-28. PubMed ID: 18331927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography.
    Sumer AP; Caliskan A; Uzun C; Karoz TB; Sumer M; Cankaya S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 45(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 26458537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage--a clinical and radiological study.
    Wehrbein H; Merz BR; Diedrich P
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Feb; 21(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 10191579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of palatal bone thickness in adults with cone beam computerised tomography.
    Gracco A; Luca L; Cozzani M; Siciliani G
    Aust Orthod J; 2007 Nov; 23(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 18200788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of stability between delayed versus immediately loaded orthodontic palatal implants.
    Jackson A; Lemke R; Hatch J; Salome N; Gakunga P; Cochran D
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008; 20(3):174-84. PubMed ID: 18533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone-to-implant contact of orthodontic implants in humans--a histomorphometric investigation.
    Jung BA; Yildizhan F; Wehrbein H
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):552-7. PubMed ID: 19054812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the palatal bone for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in Japanese adults.
    Nakahara K; Matsunaga S; Abe S; Tamatsu Y; Kageyama I; Hashimoto M; Ide Y
    Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 22435178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The nasopalatine canal as an anatomic buttress for implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla: a pilot study.
    Peñarrocha M; Carrillo C; Uribe R; García B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):936-42. PubMed ID: 19865635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aspects of the use of endosseous palatal implants in orthodontic therapy.
    Wehrbein H; Merz BR
    J Esthet Dent; 1998; 10(6):315-24. PubMed ID: 10321202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.