189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939303)
21. Visual field progression in glaucoma: total versus pattern deviation analyses.
Artes PH; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4600-6. PubMed ID: 16303955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A comparison of the pattern- and total deviation-based Glaucoma Change Probability programs.
Katz J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Apr; 41(5):1012-6. PubMed ID: 10752935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Effective Dynamic Ranges for Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression With Standard Automated Perimetry and Stimulus Sizes III and V.
Wall M; Zamba GKD; Artes PH
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Jan; 59(1):439-445. PubMed ID: 29356822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Detect Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma Based on Spatial Pattern Analysis.
Wang M; Shen LQ; Pasquale LR; Petrakos P; Formica S; Boland MV; Wellik SR; De Moraes CG; Myers JS; Saeedi O; Wang H; Baniasadi N; Li D; Tichelaar J; Bex PJ; Elze T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Jan; 60(1):365-375. PubMed ID: 30682206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Estimating the rate of progressive visual field damage in those with open-angle glaucoma, from cross-sectional data.
Broman AT; Quigley HA; West SK; Katz J; Munoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; Tielsch JM; Friedman DS; Crowston J; Taylor HR; Varma R; Leske MC; Bengtsson B; Heijl A; He M; Foster PJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Jan; 49(1):66-76. PubMed ID: 18172076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Can Home Monitoring Allow Earlier Detection of Rapid Visual Field Progression in Glaucoma?
Anderson AJ; Bedggood PA; George Kong YX; Martin KR; Vingrys AJ
Ophthalmology; 2017 Dec; 124(12):1735-1742. PubMed ID: 28764889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interocular asymmetry of visual field defects in primary open angle glaucoma and primary angle-closure glaucoma.
Wang JC; Gazzard G; Foster PJ; Devereux JG; Oen FT; Chew PT; Khaw PT; Seah SK
Eye (Lond); 2004 Apr; 18(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 15069431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Neural networks to identify glaucomatous visual field progression.
Lin A; Hoffman D; Gaasterland DE; Caprioli J
Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jan; 135(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12504697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of conventional and pattern discrimination perimetry in a prospective study of glaucoma patients.
Ansari I; Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; LeBlanc RP
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Dec; 41(13):4150-7. PubMed ID: 11095608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Progression of visual field in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma - ProgF study 1.
Aptel F; Aryal-Charles N; Giraud JM; El Chehab H; Delbarre M; Chiquet C; Romanet JP; Renard JP
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 93(8):e615-20. PubMed ID: 26095771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis.
Fayers T; Strouthidis NG; Garway-Heath DF
Ophthalmology; 2007 Nov; 114(11):1973-80. PubMed ID: 17662455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Agreement in detecting glaucomatous visual field progression by using guided progression analysis ?and Humphrey overview printout.
Iester M; Corallo G; Capris E; Capris P
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(5):573-9. PubMed ID: 21319135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Frequency of Testing to Detect Visual Field Progression Derived Using a Longitudinal Cohort of Glaucoma Patients.
Wu Z; Saunders LJ; Daga FB; Diniz-Filho A; Medeiros FA
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jun; 124(6):786-792. PubMed ID: 28268099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visual field progression in glaucoma: what is the specificity of the Guided Progression Analysis?
Artes PH; O'Leary N; Nicolela MT; Chauhan BC; Crabb DP
Ophthalmology; 2014 Oct; 121(10):2023-7. PubMed ID: 24878173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry.
Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A model for quantitative assessment of visual field changes in primary open-angle glaucoma with a computerized perimeter DICON TKS 4000.
Atanassov M; Konareva-Kostianeva M
Folia Med (Plovdiv); 1998; 40(2):46-51. PubMed ID: 9707812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Scanning laser polarimetry using variable corneal compensation in the detection of glaucoma with localized visual field defects.
Kook MS; Cho HS; Seong M; Choi J
Ophthalmology; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1970-8. PubMed ID: 16185765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Ganglion Cell-Inner Plexiform Layer Change Detected by Optical Coherence Tomography Indicates Progression in Advanced Glaucoma.
Shin JW; Sung KR; Lee GC; Durbin MK; Cheng D
Ophthalmology; 2017 Oct; 124(10):1466-1474. PubMed ID: 28549518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic Accuracy of Technologies for Glaucoma Case-Finding in a Community Setting.
Dabasia PL; Fidalgo BR; Edgar DF; Garway-Heath DF; Lawrenson JG
Ophthalmology; 2015 Dec; 122(12):2407-15. PubMed ID: 26411836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
