219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939779)
1. Baseline adjustments for binary data in repeated cross-sectional cluster randomized trials.
Nixon RM; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2673-92. PubMed ID: 12939779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A simulation study of odds ratio estimation for binary outcomes from cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC; Carlin JB; Gulliford MC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(18):3415-28. PubMed ID: 17154246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
Ukoumunne OC
Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size adjustments for varying cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes analyzed with second-order PQL mixed logistic regression.
Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1488-501. PubMed ID: 20101669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a mixed effects logistic regression model for binary outcomes with unequal cluster size.
Heo M; Leon AC
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):513-26. PubMed ID: 15920895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
Klar N; Darlington G
Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements.
Hernández AV; Steyerberg EW; Habbema JD
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 May; 57(5):454-60. PubMed ID: 15196615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power and money in cluster randomized trials: when is it worth measuring a covariate?
Moerbeek M
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2607-17. PubMed ID: 16217840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Imputation strategies for missing continuous outcomes in cluster randomized trials.
Taljaard M; Donner A; Klar N
Biom J; 2008 Jun; 50(3):329-45. PubMed ID: 18537126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian methods for analysis of binary outcome data in cluster randomized trials on the absolute risk scale.
Thompson SG; Warn DE; Turner RM
Stat Med; 2004 Feb; 23(3):389-410. PubMed ID: 14748035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cluster-crossover design: a method for limiting clusters level effect in community-intervention studies.
Parienti JJ; Kuss O
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):316-23. PubMed ID: 17110172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cluster randomized trials produced similar results to individually randomized trials in a meta-analysis of enhanced care for depression.
Gilbody S; Bower P; Torgerson D; Richards D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):160-168. PubMed ID: 18177789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
Lewsey JD
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Varying cluster sizes in trials with clusters in one treatment arm: sample size adjustments when testing treatment effects with linear mixed models.
Candel MJ; Van Breukelen GJ
Stat Med; 2009 Aug; 28(18):2307-24. PubMed ID: 19472169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods for the statistical analysis of binary data in split-cluster designs.
Donner A; Klar N; Zou G
Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):919-25. PubMed ID: 15606412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
