750 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939780)
1. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
Sidik K; Jonkman JN
J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
Higgins JP; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Meta-regression with partial information on summary trial or patient characteristics.
Hemming K; Hutton JL; Maguire MG; Marson AG
Stat Med; 2010 May; 29(12):1312-24. PubMed ID: 20087842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Meta-analysis of continuous outcome data from individual patients.
Higgins JP; Whitehead A; Turner RM; Omar RZ; Thompson SG
Stat Med; 2001 Aug; 20(15):2219-41. PubMed ID: 11468761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.
Hartung J; Knapp G
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints.
Harbord RM; Egger M; Sterne JA
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3443-57. PubMed ID: 16345038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies using individual patient data and aggregate data.
Riley RD; Dodd SR; Craig JV; Thompson JR; Williamson PR
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(29):6111-36. PubMed ID: 18816508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended follow-up and spatial analysis of the American Cancer Society study linking particulate air pollution and mortality.
Krewski D; Jerrett M; Burnett RT; Ma R; Hughes E; Shi Y; Turner MC; Pope CA; Thurston G; Calle EE; Thun MJ; Beckerman B; DeLuca P; Finkelstein N; Ito K; Moore DK; Newbold KB; Ramsay T; Ross Z; Shin H; Tempalski B
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2009 May; (140):5-114; discussion 115-36. PubMed ID: 19627030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.
Berkey CS; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Colditz GA
Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 7746979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
Rücker G; Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G
Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):351-68. PubMed ID: 21374698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of one-step and two-step meta-analysis models using individual patient data.
Mathew T; Nordström K
Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):271-87. PubMed ID: 20349448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.
DerSimonian R; Kacker R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating trial and treatment heterogeneity in an individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data by means of the penalized maximum likelihood approach.
Rondeau V; Michiels S; Liquet B; Pignon JP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1894-910. PubMed ID: 18069745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Meta-analysis methodology for combining treatment effects from Cox proportional hazard models with different covariate adjustments.
Yuan X; Anderson SJ
Biom J; 2010 Aug; 52(4):519-37. PubMed ID: 20661952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
