197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 12939781)
1. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adjusting for verification bias in diagnostic test evaluation: a Bayesian approach.
Buzoianu M; Kadane JB
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2453-73. PubMed ID: 17979150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating medical diagnostic tests at the subunit level in the presence of verification bias.
Barnhart HX; Kosinski AS
Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2161-76. PubMed ID: 12820281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian approach to simultaneously adjusting for verification and reference standard bias in diagnostic test studies.
Lu Y; Dendukuri N; Schiller I; Joseph L
Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2532-43. PubMed ID: 20799249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnosing diagnostic tests: evaluating the assumptions underlying the estimation of sensitivity and specificity in the absence of a gold standard.
Toft N; Jørgensen E; Højsgaard S
Prev Vet Med; 2005 Apr; 68(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 15795013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An interactive web-based tool for detecting verification (work-up) bias in studies of the efficacy of diagnostic imaging.
Richardson ML; Petscavage JM
Acad Radiol; 2010 Dec; 17(12):1580-3. PubMed ID: 20926316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Verification bias an underrecognized source of error in assessing the efficacy of medical imaging.
Petscavage JM; Richardson ML; Carr RB
Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):343-6. PubMed ID: 21145764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian estimation for performance measures of two diagnostic tests in the presence of verification bias.
Aragon DC; Martinez EZ; Achcar JA
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 Jul; 20(4):821-34. PubMed ID: 20496208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A sequential design to estimate sensitivity and specificity of a diagnostic or screening test.
Wruck LM; Yiannoutsos CT; Hughes MD
Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(20):3458-73. PubMed ID: 16374904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.
Pepe MS; Janes H
Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):474-84. PubMed ID: 17085745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How to deal with double partial verification when evaluating two index tests in relation to a reference test?
van Geloven N; Brooze KA; Opmeer BC; Mol BW; Zwinderman AH
Stat Med; 2012 May; 31(11-12):1265-76. PubMed ID: 22161741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
Albert PS
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Post hoc choice of cut points introduced bias to diagnostic research.
Ewald B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):798-801. PubMed ID: 16828672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bayesian analysis of diagnostic test accuracy when disease state is unverified for some subjects.
Pennello GA
J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Sep; 21(5):954-70. PubMed ID: 21830925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Biplot as a diagnostic tool of local dependence in latent class models. A medical application.
Sepúlveda R; Vicente-Villardón JL; Galindo MP
Stat Med; 2008 May; 27(11):1855-69. PubMed ID: 18265437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias in clinical studies for Alzheimer's disease.
Zhou XH; Castelluccio P
Stat Med; 2004 Jan; 23(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 14716724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
